2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2020.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 associated Kawasaki-like multisystem inflammatory syndrome in an adult

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The school age group was predominantly affected in this cohort as seen in earlier studies which documented older children than those usually affected in typical KD. 5 , 17 , 26 There are infrequent reports of the occurrence of the syndrome in adults 27 and male preponderance has also been shown in several study groups 26 , 28 , 29 as was seen in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The school age group was predominantly affected in this cohort as seen in earlier studies which documented older children than those usually affected in typical KD. 5 , 17 , 26 There are infrequent reports of the occurrence of the syndrome in adults 27 and male preponderance has also been shown in several study groups 26 , 28 , 29 as was seen in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Understanding the dynamics of COVID-19-associated microbiome alterations may help identify microbiome-based strategies with potential applications in COVID-19 management and treatment. Furthermore, our findings highlight that non-invasive organ and/or system-based microbiome profiling may serve not only for COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis but also, for the identification of individuals at risk of secondary infections, chronic disease, and/or degenerative inflammatory symptoms, including Kawasaki-like disease (KLD) and multisystem inflammation, as is the case with children and young adults ( Akca et al., 2020 ; Cheung et al., 2020 ; Sokolovsky et al., 2021 ; Elouardi et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…summarizes the study selection process. We excluded 8 articles: 3 were not in English, 3 could not be located, 1 abstract did not have enough data for inclusion, and 1 reported case was deemed a misdiagnosis by 2 clinicians (P.P. and J.D.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%