COVID-19 and Dentistry: Prevention in Dental Practice, a Literature Review

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is a member of the family of coronaviruses. The first cases were recorded in Wuhan, China, between December 2019 and January 2020. Italy is one of the most affected countries in Europe. COVID-19 is a new challenge in modern dentistry. New guidelines are required in dental clinics to avoid contagion caused by cross-infections. A narrative review was performed using both primary sources, such as scientific articles and secondary ones, such as bibliographic indexes, web pages, and databases. The main search engines were PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Twelve articles were selected to develop the bibliographic review by applying pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Precautionary measures should be applied to control COVID-19 in clinical practice. Several authors have highlighted the importance of telephone triage and/or clinic questionnaires, body temperature measurement, usage of personal protective equipment, surface disinfection with ethanol between 62% and 71%, high-speed instruments equipped with an anti-retraction system, four-handed work, and large-volume cannulas for aspiration. Clinically, the use of a rubber dam is essential. FFP2 (or N95) and FFP3 respirators, if compared to surgical masks, provide greater protection for health workers against viral respiratory infections. Further accurate studies are needed to confirm this.

Comprehensive review of guidelines to practice prosthodontic and implant procedures during COVID-19 pandemic

“…and sanitize their hands thoroughly. 15 One attendant per needy patient is preferable owing to the norm of maintaining physical distancing. 16 Patient should be provided with triple layer facemask, disposable shoe-covers, head cap and gloves.…”

The Role of the Dental Surgeon in Controlling the Dissemination of COVID-19: A Literature Review

“…In cases of proven or suspected COVID-19 infection, the safest options are the N95, FFP2 and FFP3 masks because they are more suitable for protection against biological agents. FFP2 and FFP3 have minimum filtration efficiencies of 94% and 99%, respectively [ 41 ]. The use of a FFP2/FFP3 (face filtering piece) respirator mask is recommended for all aerosol-generating procedures performed when caring for patients [ 42 ].…”

COVID-19 Patient in a Dental Office – Literature Review

“…According to the ADA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the waiting area for patients should be empty. It is recommended to remove non-essential items such as magazines, brochures, models of dental displays, and chairs should be 2 m apart [8,12]. The Table 1.…”

“…[4]. The WHO recommendations suggest the use of FFP3 masks [12]. The respiratory tract is the main gateway for the virus and should be covered with an appropriate mask.…”