2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10157-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 and Biomedical Experts: When Epistemic Authority is (Probably) Not Enough

Abstract: This critical essay evaluates the potential integration of distinct kinds of expertise in policymaking, especially during situations of critical emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This article relies on two case studies: (i) herd immunity (UK) and (ii) restricted access to ventilators for disabled people (USA). These case studies are discussed as examples of experts’ recommendations that have not been widely accepted, though they were made within the boundaries of expert epistemic authority. While the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public health and policy measures aimed at containing the pandemic, when not carefully planned, can result in negative health and socio‐economic consequences for populations who are made vulnerable by systems, such as children with NDD‐MC and their families (Pietrini et al, 2022). Care coordination is one intervention to address these inequities; however, little is known regarding the impact of COVID‐19 pandemic restrictions on care coordination (Jesus et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public health and policy measures aimed at containing the pandemic, when not carefully planned, can result in negative health and socio‐economic consequences for populations who are made vulnerable by systems, such as children with NDD‐MC and their families (Pietrini et al, 2022). Care coordination is one intervention to address these inequities; however, little is known regarding the impact of COVID‐19 pandemic restrictions on care coordination (Jesus et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%