2014
DOI: 10.1108/jap-07-2013-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covert research and adult protection and safeguarding: an ethical dilemma?

Abstract: Covert research and adult protection 2 AbstractPurpose This paper considers the contentious issue of covert research in studying the social contexts of vulnerable groups. It explores its potential utility in areas where overt strategies may be problematic or denied; and examines and problematises the issue of participant consent.Design/methodology. Using a literature-based review and selected previous studies, the paper explores the uses and abuses of covert research in relation to ethics review proceedings go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same situation where some principles supersede others based on a situation was documented by Aellah et al (2016), who raised the issues of the emotional struggle researchers sometimes deal with when faced with the conditions of abject poverty experienced by some participants. If the action will not cause harm to any person, the principles of consent and privacy may be infringed to the best benefit of the participants and community (Hardwick & Worsely, 2011; Parker & Crabtree 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same situation where some principles supersede others based on a situation was documented by Aellah et al (2016), who raised the issues of the emotional struggle researchers sometimes deal with when faced with the conditions of abject poverty experienced by some participants. If the action will not cause harm to any person, the principles of consent and privacy may be infringed to the best benefit of the participants and community (Hardwick & Worsely, 2011; Parker & Crabtree 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this is an area of life where there are many “unknown unknowns” as memorably suggested by Donald Rumsfeld. Indeed, the concept of informed consent is hotly contested (Parker and Ashencaen Crabtree, 2014). What is needed in respect of advance decisions and planning is the amplification of information, the debunking of myths and simplifying the process for completion.…”
Section: Ways Forward For the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that health research via Twitter does not typically involve active recruitment, and the typical recruitment technique involves tweeting to large audiences unaware that they are participating in research, termed covert research. Arguments for covert research focus on concerns of bias when participants are made aware of the researcher's professional identity, which affects the validity of observations and data (Parker & Crabtree, 2014). Opponents of covert research argue that it is a form of deception that eliminates participants' choice and that lack of transparency can lead to less than ideal research circumstances, which may cause stress and harm to participants and decrease credibility of future researchers (Parker & Crabtree, 2014).…”
Section: Participant Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguments for covert research focus on concerns of bias when participants are made aware of the researcher's professional identity, which affects the validity of observations and data (Parker & Crabtree, 2014). Opponents of covert research argue that it is a form of deception that eliminates participants' choice and that lack of transparency can lead to less than ideal research circumstances, which may cause stress and harm to participants and decrease credibility of future researchers (Parker & Crabtree, 2014). Active or overt participant recruitment on Twitter may involve contacting participants individually and conducting the informed consent process based on research ethics approval process, which takes valuable time and resources; however, it is argued that trustworthy data can only be created through establishing a trusting relationship between the researcher and participants (Pitts & Mille-Day, 2007).…”
Section: Participant Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%