Covert and Overt Operations: Interwar Political Policing in the United States and the United Kingdom

Abstract

The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Readers should consult the final copy-edited version published in the American Historical ReviewSINCE THE EARLY DAYS OF THE Cold War, observers have reproached American anticommunism by invoking the example of British moderation. Historians have often compared the British and American approaches to policing communism, finding that traditions of political toleration in the UK forestalled the extremities of political repression that culminated in the McCarthy era in the U.S. As one writer has put it,"The caution and concern for liberty displayed by the British would, if transferred to America, have prevented many heartbreaks and injustices in the United States." 1 In these accounts, when atomic spy scandals threatened the emerging Anglo-American "special relationship," British officials adopted a moderate loyalty-screening program for civil servants at the United States' behest, but avoided the sorts of abuses that have earned an abiding disrepute for American anticommunism. However, the story is considerably more complicated. During the interwar years, British political policing operations dwarfed the American regime. The interwar British security services rivaled the Cold War-era FBI in the scale and scope of their surveillance operations. The development of the post-World War II American

Cops at War: How World War II Transformed U.S. Policing

“…In September 1939, President Roosevelt enlarged the FBI and directed it to cooperate with local police forces regarding the risks the war in Europe entailed, which historians see as the official catalyst for the FBI to become an intelligence agency. 41 The FBI and other police agencies began cooperating in new ways. Though affirming that no national police force would emerge, Hoover maintained primacy in these relationships.…”

Neoliberalism’s prologue: Keynesianism, myths of class compromises and the restoration of class power

“…During World War I, the federal government increasingly criminalized political dissent through the Espionage and Sedition Acts. As the government fashioned images of domestic threats to the nation, it expanded security institutions in the form of the Bureau of Investigation (BI)––later to become the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)––and implemented wide-ranging censorship and surveillance (Luff, 2017). The rise of Soviet power became the pretext for policymakers to intensify their conflict with organized labour.…”

“…Government officials and business leaders increasingly imagined labour leadership collaborating with Russia to overthrow the government, leading to the belief that labour militancy was a ‘red menace’. As Mark Mazower argues, the Bolshevik Revolution became ‘a permanent justification for expanding political policing work in capitalist societies’ (1997: 244; cited in Luff, 2017). Congressional scrutiny facilitated the government’s foray into policing politics.…”

‘Co-operation and Communism cannot work side by side’: Organized Consumers and the Early Cold War in Britain

“…79 Although an extensive anti-subversive apparatus can be traced back to the 1920s -undermining myths about Britain being a liberal 'peaceable kingdom' within which civil liberties were always paramount -the early post-war years represented a crucial phase in the making of a modern security regime. 80 Alexander also chaired early meetings of a senior ministerial group, the Committee on Subversive Activities, and pushed hard for the vetting of both Civil Service and industrial workers, the latter against considerable opposition. 83 After a personal request, Mayhew sent Alexander anti-communist material produced by the IRD in the summer of 1948, confiding to him that, 'If you can help us out in your speeches we would be most grateful', and suggesting that appropriate text written by Alexander could be disseminated abroad through the BBC.…”