2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.comgeo.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covering points by disjoint boxes with outliers

Abstract: For a set of n points in the plane, we consider the axis-aligned (p, k)-Box Covering problem: Find p axis-aligned, pairwise-disjoint boxes that together contain at least n − k points. In this paper, we consider the boxes to be either squares or rectangles, and we want to minimize the area of the largest box. For general p we show that the problem is NP-hard for both squares and rectangles. For a small, fixed number p, we give algorithms that find the solution in the following running times: For squares we have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if one were to have access to an oracle that could find the optimal covering of a data set for any radius, our problem could be solved by finding the minimum radius that gives the desired number of covering spheres (e.g., via binary search). Unfortunately, finding the minimum-cardinality cover is NP-complete (Attali et al, 2016), and although algorithms for a variety of simplified settings have been studied (Ahn et al, 2011; Alt et al, 2006; Chan and Hu, 2015; Chvatal, 1979), none scales to the high-dimensional and large-scale data that we need to handle in single-cell genomics. Given the hardness of the covering problem, we aimed to devise an approximate covering algorithm that readily scales to large-scale single-cell data while maintaining good sketch quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if one were to have access to an oracle that could find the optimal covering of a data set for any radius, our problem could be solved by finding the minimum radius that gives the desired number of covering spheres (e.g., via binary search). Unfortunately, finding the minimum-cardinality cover is NP-complete (Attali et al, 2016), and although algorithms for a variety of simplified settings have been studied (Ahn et al, 2011; Alt et al, 2006; Chan and Hu, 2015; Chvatal, 1979), none scales to the high-dimensional and large-scale data that we need to handle in single-cell genomics. Given the hardness of the covering problem, we aimed to devise an approximate covering algorithm that readily scales to large-scale single-cell data while maintaining good sketch quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if one were to have access to an oracle that could find the optimal covering of a dataset for any radius, our problem could be solved by finding the minimum radius that gives the desired number of covering spheres (e.g., via binary search). Unfortunately, finding the minimum-cardinality cover is NP-complete (Attali et al, 2016), and although algorithms for a variety of simplified settings have been studied (Ahn et al, 2011;Alt et al, 2006;Chan and Hu, 2015;Chvatal, 1979), none scales to the high-dimensional and large-scale data that we need to handle in single-cell genomics. Given the hardness of the covering problem, we aimed to devise an approximate covering algorithm that readily scales to large-scale single-cell data while maintaining good sketch quality.…”
Section: Theoretical Connection To Covering Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the motivation behind the RR and DA algorithms presented in this paper. There has been significant past work on covering points with various geometrical objects [8]- [15]. Our approach draws contrast from these methods in that we seek to use lines as a satisfactory approximation of a multi-class dataset, instead of a precise covering of all points.…”
Section: A Finding Co-linear Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%