1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02788235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covering numbers: Arithmetics and dynamics for rotations and interval exchanges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, a large gap for N = q i is split up into a i+1 small gaps for Ñ = q i+1 and 1 large gap for Ñ = q i+1 . These observations imply four fundamental but important facts for disjoint orbits of sets of the form described in (1) with n B = 2. Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: And Only If α Has Unbounded Partial Quotientsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, a large gap for N = q i is split up into a i+1 small gaps for Ñ = q i+1 and 1 large gap for Ñ = q i+1 . These observations imply four fundamental but important facts for disjoint orbits of sets of the form described in (1) with n B = 2. Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: And Only If α Has Unbounded Partial Quotientsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The properties of f α and also of the structure of its Rokhlin towers have been comprehensively studied, see e.g. [1,3,[6][7][8][9] to name only a few references. Here, we ask how to find nice sets B for f α given ε > 0, h ∈ N. In [3], a method based on the three gap theorem (Theorem 2.1) was introduced how to calculate the minimal admissible value ε for f α if we choose B as an interval, see Theorem 1.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of B in Thorem 2.1 below, and the subsequent Theorem 2.2, which was the main motivation for the present paper, were known to P. Hubert and T. Monteil (private communications), but never written to our knowledge. The quantity 1 B ′ was indeed computed in [11] (see also [5]) as, for irrational rotations, it is equal to another invariant of topological conjugacy, the covering number by intervals [11], which involves covering the space by Rokhlin towers; the spectrum of its possible values is the object of a question in [11] and in [9], to which Theorem 2.3 below gives a first (to our knowledge), though belated and partial, answer.…”
Section: Rotations and The Dynamical Definition Of The Lagrange Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38196... and 3 − √ 3 = 1, 26794..., and there is no other element above5 It contains an accumulation point equal to√ 5 − 1 = 1, 2360... It contains the interval [1, 1 + 4 83+18 03688...].The third highest number in this spectrum is 16−2404..., as can be seen with longer computations; the point √ 5 − 1 is the highest accumulation point, but to prove it requires a machinery similar to the one used to prove Theorem 5 in Chapter 1 of[12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that these brilliant examples, built on purpose, are a little complicated and not very explicit as interval exchange transformations. We know of only one family of interval exchange transformations which have simple spectrum but not rank one, these were built in [5] but only for 3 intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%