1979
DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(79)90052-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covering large groin defects with the tensor fascia lata musculocutaneous flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3,4,1214,17,29–31 The advantages of muscle flaps are numerous and include increased blood supply to the operated area, bringing with it oxygen, nutrients, leukocytes, and systemic antibiotics. 4 The dead space left after extensive debridement of necrotic tissue can be filled by the patient’s own tissue, reducing the risk for potential complications and recurrent infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,3,4,1214,17,29–31 The advantages of muscle flaps are numerous and include increased blood supply to the operated area, bringing with it oxygen, nutrients, leukocytes, and systemic antibiotics. 4 The dead space left after extensive debridement of necrotic tissue can be filled by the patient’s own tissue, reducing the risk for potential complications and recurrent infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,1316 Although NWPT has shown to be a valuable treatment option, there are situations where stable wound coverage cannot be obtained with such a modality alone. In a case report from 1979, Hill et al 17 used a combination of sartorius muscle (SM) flap and tensor fascia lata (TFL) musculocutaneous flap to cover the femoral vessels and close a groin wound after tumor resection. To our knowledge, there are no publications that report on this flap combination in the treatment of groin infections following arterial revascularization procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sartorius, rectus abdominis, rectus femoris, gracilis, abdominal skin flaps and TFL flap [9]. Potential disadvantages, as mentioned in the literature, would be the following: abdominal weakness, bulging or hernia (the use of rectus abdominis muscle flap) [10], lateral thigh paresthesia (the use of anterior thigh flap) [11], significant knee weakness (rectus femoris muscle flap) [12], large defect of the donor site and excessive bulkiness on the recipient site (use of muscular flaps in general) [12,13,14]. The consensus which flap represents the best suitable choice does not exist; nevertheless, the use of local instead of free flaps, if possible, remains justified [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TFL muscle is a thin, flat muscle, with a single dominant vascular pedicle (Type I flap by Kormack Lamberty). The flap showed great success with relatively low donor site morbidity, compared to other flaps [13,14,16]. The advantages of the TFL flap would be the following: the involvement of well-vascularized tissue composed of thin sensate skin, thin subcutaneous tissue, and muscle, including large amount of durable fascia; long arch of rotation, and broad coverage area of up to 600 cm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable flap to use is the tensor fascia lata flap which is based on the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. Because of its proximity to the groin, it is a workhorse flap for the region and has been used successfully for large defects [11,12]. It is associated with minimal functional morbidity, and the donor site can be skin grafted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%