Molodtsov originated soft set theory, which followed a general mathematical framework for handling uncertainties, in which we encounter the data by affixing the parameterized factor during the information analysis. The aim of this paper is to establish a bridge to connect a soft set and the union operations on sets, then applying it to BCK/BCI-algebras. Firstly, we introduce the notion of the (α, β)-Union-Soft ((α, β)-US) set, with some supporting examples. Then, we discuss the soft BCK/BCI-algebras, which are called (α, β)-US algebras, (α, β)-US ideals, (α, β)-US closed ideals, and (α, β)-US commutative ideals. In particular, some related properties and relationships of the above algebraic structures are investigated. We also provide the condition of an (α, β)-US ideal to be an (α, β)-US closed ideal. Some conditions for a Union-Soft (US) ideal to be a US commutative ideal are given by means of (α, β)-unions. Moreover, several characterization theorems of (closed) US ideals and US commutative ideals are given in terms of (α, β)-unions. Finally, the extension property for an (α, β)-US commutative ideal is established.Mathematics 2019, 7, 252 2 of 18 (M, N)-SI-h-quasi-ideals in the environment of hemirings. At the same time, different soft algebraic structures have been developed on BCK/BCI-algebras, which was proposed by Imai and Iśeki [27,28]. Here, we briefly review some results of soft sets in the existing literature of BCK/BCI-algebras. Jana et al. [29][30][31], Ma and Zhan [32][33][34], and Senapati et al. [35,36] performed detailed investigations on BCK/BCI-algebras and related algebraic systems. In [37], Jun first constructed soft algebraic structure of BCK/BCI-algebras. Jun and Park [38] also pointed out applications of soft sets in the ideal theory of BCK/BCI-algebras. Jun et al. [39] also studied the soft p-ideal of soft BCI-algebras. Acar and Özürk [40] analytically studied maximal, irreducible, and prime soft ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras with supporting examples. First, Jun et al. [41,42] proposed a novel concept, namely union-soft sets and int-soft sets, and then implemented it to develop union-soft BCK/BCI-algebras and int-soft BCK/BCI-algebras. Sezgin [43] considered studying soft union interior ideals, quasi-ideals, and generalized bi-ideals of rings and gave their interrelationship. She also studied regular, intra-regular, regular-duo, and strongly-regular properties of rings in terms of soft-union ideals. Sezgin et al. [44] introduced a new soft classical ring theory, namely soft intersection rings, ideals, bi-ideals, interior ideals, and quasi-ideals. Furthermore, they defined their soft-union intersection product and their corresponding relationships. Jana and Pal [45] defined the concept of (α, β)-soft intersection sets and then introduced this ideal to develop (α, β)-soft intersectional groups structures and their various properties. Jana and Pal [46] also motivated using the same concept for the development of (α, β)-soft intersectional BCK/BCI algebraic structures. Again, Jana et al. [47] pr...