2015
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v35n1p89-97/2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage mobilization by different no-tillage in-line handling mechanisms

Abstract: Vegetation cover on soil acts positively in maintaining temperature and soil moisture, yet, it has been imposing specific operational conditions on seeders. The objective of this study was to evaluate performance of different mechanisms regarding straw mobilization, employed in a no-till seeder. The experimental area was conducted on clayey soil under no-tillage with a large quantity of sorghum residue. The experiment was established in a randomized block design, as the treatments consisted of a combination of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, it is stated that the soil mobilization set (the disc plus shank) of the seeder used in this study is adequate in the assumption of low soil mobilization recommended by the direct seeding system. Brandelero et al (2014), when evaluating different mechanisms for furrow sowing management in direct seeding, verified that the LSS ranged from 0.165 to 0.28 m, when the average furrow depth was 0.049 and 0.081 m, respectively. This characteristic of low LSS caused by the furrow opener shank, even working at greater depths, is essential because greater mobilized soil surface areas tends to cause increases in soil loss (Volk & Cogo, 2014), as well as greater weed emergence in the seeding line (Theisen & Bianchi, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In general, it is stated that the soil mobilization set (the disc plus shank) of the seeder used in this study is adequate in the assumption of low soil mobilization recommended by the direct seeding system. Brandelero et al (2014), when evaluating different mechanisms for furrow sowing management in direct seeding, verified that the LSS ranged from 0.165 to 0.28 m, when the average furrow depth was 0.049 and 0.081 m, respectively. This characteristic of low LSS caused by the furrow opener shank, even working at greater depths, is essential because greater mobilized soil surface areas tends to cause increases in soil loss (Volk & Cogo, 2014), as well as greater weed emergence in the seeding line (Theisen & Bianchi, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%