2010
DOI: 10.1097/ss.0b013e3181cf7959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cover Crop Effects on Crop Yields and Soil Organic Carbon Content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
44
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2b), and was 0.75 Mg ha -1 greater at the agronomic maximum N rate (plateau yield; Table 5). No-till cropping systems may benefit from cover crops through decreased soil erosion, increased N recycling, improved soil quality, and increased crop yield (Olson et al, 2010;Moore et al, 2014;Reinbott et al, 2004). That was not the case in our study, where reduced yield was potentially due to an allelopathic effect from the RCC on corn growth or differences in soil properties between no-RCC and RCC during the growing season.…”
Section: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Response Corn Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b), and was 0.75 Mg ha -1 greater at the agronomic maximum N rate (plateau yield; Table 5). No-till cropping systems may benefit from cover crops through decreased soil erosion, increased N recycling, improved soil quality, and increased crop yield (Olson et al, 2010;Moore et al, 2014;Reinbott et al, 2004). That was not the case in our study, where reduced yield was potentially due to an allelopathic effect from the RCC on corn growth or differences in soil properties between no-RCC and RCC during the growing season.…”
Section: Corn Yield and Nitrogen Response Corn Yieldcontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Studies conducted in the Midwest region of the USA show that cover crops can reduce NO 3 loss from 7 to 65 kg N ha -1 (Dabney et al, 2010;Kaspar et al, 2012;Malone et al, 2014). Cover crops also have potential to improve C sequestration, nutrient cycling, soil internal drainage, and help reduce runoff, soil erosion, and weed pressure (Franzluebber, 2005;Hoorman, 2009, Olson et al, 2010Bernstein et al, 2011;Mirsky et al, 2013;Tabaglio et al, 2013). Despite their benefits, cover crops have not been widely adopted in the Midwest due to several factors, including increased cost and management, lack of success in nutrient recycling, limited establishment and growth during late fall and early spring, reduced crop yields, and seed availability (Raimbault et al, 1990;Johnson et al, 1998;Reddy, 2001;Dabney et al, 2001;Thelen and Leep, 2002;Andraski and Bundy, 2005;Kramberger et al, 2009;Reese et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Cover crops with fibrous roots bind aggregates of loose sandy soil and assimilate mineralized nutrients, retaining valuable crop nutrients within the agroecosystem [23]. Compact soils have smaller pores and poorer water infiltration, and as a result they are more vulnerable to erosion by runoff; plants with a large taproot (e.g., fodder radish) create large pores in compact soil to improve water infiltration [24].…”
Section: Cover Crops Mitigate Erosion On Sloping Landsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) is developed through generations of experience and is rarely written down, as a result, TEK/ITK is vulnerable to loss, and there is an intrinsic value to its preservation [104]. Tacit value can be generated by developing novel interventions that utilize aspects of TEK to monitor and Water use efficiency Drought tolerance [32] Nitrogen fixation Plant nutrition, soil fertility [32] Phosphate mineralization Plant nutrition [32] Palatability Feed quality [32] Spreading growth Soil cover, prevent erosion [32] Long roots Deep penetration, sequester moisture [121] Fibrous roots Bind aggregates, prevent erosion [23] Suppressive exudates Suppress pests and diseases [122] Seed storability Shelf life [123] Lack of dormancy Can be planted readily [123] Germination Even canopy formation [123] Inbreeding Homogenous populations from saved seed [123] Duration Compatibility with crop rotation [32] Regrowth Tolerance of trampling, grazing, and cutting [32] Naturalized Not invasive [32] Allelopathy Suppression of weeds [48] Yield Productivity [32] Low input Labor, water, nutrients, rainfed [32] manage ecosystems [104,105]. Botanical, agronomic, and anthropological approaches can be combined to understand and improve members of the dry season plant community [10,106,107].…”
Section: Wild Plant Selection Can Benefit From Traditional Knowledge mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sometimes TOC might not be considered a very sensitive indicator in short term agricultural systems (Alvarez and Alvarez, 2000) because of a slight or non-existent increase in its content (Lagomarsino et al, 2009;Mendes et al, 1999;Olson et al, 2010). For this reason, the evaluation of a labile fraction of the organic matter, the microbial biomass carbon (Cmic) seems to provide earlier changes in SOM contents rather than TOC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%