2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariations and trade‐offs of phosphorus (P) acquisition strategies in dioecious Populus euphratica as affected by soil water availability

Abstract: 1. Dioecious species may be particularly vulnerable to climate change because they often exhibit skewed sex ratios that are reinforced by the physiological and biological specialization of each sex to specific microhabitats. Yet, it is unclear how differences in functional traits between female and male plants lead to sexspecific responses to drought and whether these responses are associated with phosphorus (P) acquisition diverge or converge.2. Here, we measured the morphological and physiological traits of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, how AMF with PSB can alter P availability of female and male plants is not known. However, there is evidence that females and males of dioecious plants, such as poplars, support different soil microbial communities and have different root exudation rates (Xia et al, 2022). Thus, it is plausible that there are important sexual dimorphisms in P nutrition traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, how AMF with PSB can alter P availability of female and male plants is not known. However, there is evidence that females and males of dioecious plants, such as poplars, support different soil microbial communities and have different root exudation rates (Xia et al, 2022). Thus, it is plausible that there are important sexual dimorphisms in P nutrition traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female plants bear additional resource costs associated with fruiting, which are not experienced by male plants (Barrett & Hough, 2013; Hultine et al ., 2016; Lei et al ., 2017). Furthermore, contrasting resource demands for reproductive allocation result in sexual differences in plant organs' mass, nutrient composition, and concentration (Hultine et al ., 2016; Xia et al ., 2022b). Males and females occupy different ecological niches and specialize in utilizing different resources (Cox, 1981; Chen et al ., 2014; Xia et al ., 2020; Yu et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%