2014
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2013-0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariate adjusted differential variability analysis of DNA methylation with propensity score method

Abstract: It has been proposed recently that differentially variable CpG methylation (DVC) may contribute to transcriptional aberrations in human diseases. In large scale epigenetic studies, potential confounders could affect the observed methylation variabilities and need to be accounted for. In this paper, we develop a robust statistical model for differential variability DVC analysis that accounts for potential confounding covariates by utilizing the propensity score method. Our method is based on a weighted score te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 In such cases, confounding factors need to be properly accounted for to avoid biases in DNA methylation biomarker detection. There are several approaches for DM analysis which allow for confounders adjustment, 33 however to the best of our knowledge existing DV analysis approaches are not tailored for confounders adjustments, except for our earlier work 16 which proposed a DV only analysis in the presence of confounders within large scale hypothesis testings framework. This paper extends our earlier work which allows for simultaneous detection of DM and DV in large scale hypothesis testings framework, and at the same time provides a candidate feature selection mechanism for the prediction algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…32 In such cases, confounding factors need to be properly accounted for to avoid biases in DNA methylation biomarker detection. There are several approaches for DM analysis which allow for confounders adjustment, 33 however to the best of our knowledge existing DV analysis approaches are not tailored for confounders adjustments, except for our earlier work 16 which proposed a DV only analysis in the presence of confounders within large scale hypothesis testings framework. This paper extends our earlier work which allows for simultaneous detection of DM and DV in large scale hypothesis testings framework, and at the same time provides a candidate feature selection mechanism for the prediction algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several algorithms have been proposed in recent years to identify CpGs which exhibit differential variability in large scale hypothesis testing. 15 introduced a generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) framework and Kuan (2014) 16 proposed a general linear model with propensity score method for detecting CpGs with differential variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%