The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1080/09205071.2021.1952901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance matrix reconstruction with iterative mismatch approximation for robust adaptive beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For estimating the SOI SV, we employed the iterative mismatch approximation method proposed in [ 29 ] to correct the presumed SOI SV. The iterative mismatch approximation method depends on searching for the SV mismatch in the margin of the amplitude and phase error.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For estimating the SOI SV, we employed the iterative mismatch approximation method proposed in [ 29 ] to correct the presumed SOI SV. The iterative mismatch approximation method depends on searching for the SV mismatch in the margin of the amplitude and phase error.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For estimating the SOI SV, we employed the iterative mismatch approximation method proposed in [29] to correct the presumed SOI SV. The iterative mismatch approx-…”
Section: Soi Sv Estimation and Beamformer Weight Vector Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Standard Capon Beamformer (SCB) is an optimal spatial filter that maximizes the array output signal to the interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), provided that the true covariance matrix and the signal steering vector are accurately known [2]. However, the existence of systematic model mismatch, such as array calibration error, finite snapshots, and others, is inevitable [1,3]. Adaptive beamformers are sensitive to model mismatch, especially when the desired signal is present in the sampling sequences [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%