2011
DOI: 10.1214/11-aoas478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance approximation for large multivariate spatial data sets with an application to multiple climate model errors

Abstract: This paper investigates the cross-correlations across multiple climate model errors. We build a Bayesian hierarchical model that accounts for the spatial dependence of individual models as well as cross-covariances across different climate models. Our method allows for a nonseparable and nonstationary cross-covariance structure. We also present a covariance approximation approach to facilitate the computation in the modeling and analysis of very large multivariate spatial data sets. The covariance approximatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They decomposed the spatial Gaussian process into two parts: a reduced rank process to characterize the large scale dependence and a residual process to capture the small scale spatial dependence that is unexplained by the reduced rank process. This idea was then extended to the multivariate setting by Sang and Jun (2010). However, the application of tapering techniques to multivariate random fields remains to be explored due to the lack of flexible compactly supported cross-covariance functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They decomposed the spatial Gaussian process into two parts: a reduced rank process to characterize the large scale dependence and a residual process to capture the small scale spatial dependence that is unexplained by the reduced rank process. This idea was then extended to the multivariate setting by Sang and Jun (2010). However, the application of tapering techniques to multivariate random fields remains to be explored due to the lack of flexible compactly supported cross-covariance functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that µ y ∈ R 6n and K y ∈ R 6n×6n , whereas µ x ∈ R 18(n−1) and K x ∈ R 18(n−1)×18(n−1) . By separately comparing the coefficients of the quadratic, linear and constant terms in w, we find that the coefficients in (27) can be expressed in terms of the coefficients in (33). Specifically, from the quadratic and linear terms we get…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we describe our results within the specific context of the cgDNA model, the maximum entropy approach to enforcing a prescribed sparsity pattern in the stiffness (or precision) matrix in a Gaussian is potentially also of wider interest [3,6,10,36,38]. For example, in the specific application fields of numerical weather prediction and data assimilation, both sparse covariance and sparse inverse covariance (or precision) matrix estimates are adopted using other techniques such as tapering [2,5,11,33,37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we propose to use the Full-Scale Approximation with Block modulating function (FSA-Block) to speed up computations [14,15]. It consists of a summation of a reduced rank covariance and a sparse covariance with the block diagonal structure.…”
Section: Fsa-block Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the separability, the computations for the emulator with nonseparable auto-covariance models can be prohibitive when n is large. To overcome the computational bottleneck, we introduced the Full-Scale approximation (FSA) approach to reduce computations [14,15], which applies to both separable and nonseparable covariance structure. The FSA approach combines the ideas of the Gaussian predictive process [16] and covariance tapering [17] to provide a satisfactory approximation of the original covariance, under both large and small dependence scales of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%