2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10930-020-09884-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent Versus Non-covalent Enzyme Inhibition: Which Route Should We Take? A Justification of the Good and Bad from Molecular Modelling Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 29 , 30 However, their potential for nonspecific reactivity, toxicity, and undesired side‐effects, rapid in vivo metabolism and reduced oral bioavailability make the irreversible inhibitors less efficient as therapeutic agents. 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 On the other hand, drug repositioning or repurposing is a faster and less costly solution to propose potential effective drugs useful to control emerged infectious outbreaks immediately, as new drug development takes more than 10 years. 35 , 36 Currently, there are no clinically approved therapeutics available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 , 30 However, their potential for nonspecific reactivity, toxicity, and undesired side‐effects, rapid in vivo metabolism and reduced oral bioavailability make the irreversible inhibitors less efficient as therapeutic agents. 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 On the other hand, drug repositioning or repurposing is a faster and less costly solution to propose potential effective drugs useful to control emerged infectious outbreaks immediately, as new drug development takes more than 10 years. 35 , 36 Currently, there are no clinically approved therapeutics available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H-bonds usually confer structural stability and rigidity to the proteinligand complexes. Moreover, there exist Pi-Sigma interactions (Pi-anion, Pi-cation, and Pi-alkyl) and salt bridges that reportedly maximize the binding affinity between protein and ligands in a physiological environment (Rahman et al, 2016;Aljoundi et al, 2020). In the present study, the interaction between tyrosol and target enzymes (TyrRS and CYP51) witnessed some noncovalent forces inclusively H-bonds and Pi-Sigma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The protein-ligand interaction is mainly governed by two major forces, the covalent and noncovalent interactions. The covalent inhibitors are generally not preferred for drug development programme because of their expected toxicity resulting from non-specific inhibition of intracellular enzymes and proteins involved in the normal cellular functioning [40]. In present study, although the tested compounds were evaluated only for the noncovalent interactions with the target proteins, their involvement in establishing covalent interactions with the target proteins cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%