Cours de sémantique argumentative

Behe, Louise; Denuc, Marion Carel Corentin; Machado, Julio César

doi:10.51795/9786558693079

2021

DOI: 10.51795/9786558693079

|View full text |Cite

Cours de sémantique argumentative

Louise Behe¹,

Marion Carel Corentin Denuc²,

Julio César Machado³

Abstract: Todos os direitos garantidos. Qualquer parte desta obra pode ser reproduzida, transmitida ou arquivada desde que levados em conta os direitos das autoras e dos autores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A pressuposição-defeito de Paul Henry e a pressuposição argumentativa de Oswald Ducrot

Machado

2022

Cad. Est. Ling.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo apresenta uma abordagem crítica a Paul Henry, em relação à sua contestação ao conceito de pressuposição de Oswald Ducrot, o que Henry fez com base em termos como “psicossocial”, “persuasão” e “influência”, termos esses estranhos à epistemologia ducrotiana. Nossa metodologia explora um melhor tratamento teórico constituinte da noção de pressuposição argumentativa, que, ao contrário do que apresentou Henry, nunca se opera isolada, mas é sempre operável em uma démarche argumentativa composta de pressuposto (pp), posto (p) e encadeamento (→). Conservando seus méritos, defendemos a hipótese de que Henry não desconstruiu porque não abordou a pressuposição argumentativa ducrotiana, mas trabalhou pontos de uma pressuposição-defeito mais limitada, que não resiste a ambiguidades e paradoxos, desconsiderando envergaduras e refinamentos da démarche argumentativa e suas cinco constitutividades, pelas quais a pressuposição ducrotiana insiste e resiste.

show abstract

A pressuposição-defeito de Paul Henry e a pressuposição argumentativa de Oswald Ducrot

Machado

2022

Cad. Est. Ling.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Argumentative structure of the text of parliamentary speeches (based on the French language)

Gavrishina

2024

Philology. Theory & Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study is to identify the typological parameters of the argumentative structure of the text of parliamentary speeches. The paper examines the notion of argumentative structure, defines its main elements at the macro-level (the thesis and argumentative parts) and describes the relationships between them, identifying the typical speech forms of expression of these elements. The deployment of argumentation at the micro-level within the framework of the argumentative component is analyzed. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that based on the material of the French language, from the standpoint of communicatively oriented text linguistics, an analysis is carried out of the argumentative structure of the texts of parliamentary speeches aimed at convincing the addressee of the acceptability or unacceptability of a certain point of view on the political issue under discussion. As a result of the study, the following typological characteristics of the argumentative structure of the examined texts were established: intentionally determined hierarchical organization, variability manifested in different directions of the functional-semantic connection between its main elements. In addition, the results of the study made it possible to identify and systematize the functional-semantic relationships that arise within the argumentative component.

show abstract

L’interprétation argumentative en contexte

Kida

2024

corela

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dans le cadre de la sémantique argumentative, l’interprétation argumentative s’effectue selon deux méthodes, dont l’une consiste à déterminer les termes d’un « enchaînement argumentatif », discours argumentatif servant à représenter le sens d’un énoncé. Cet article vise à montrer que dans une telle interprétation on peut exploiter de diverses manières le contexte, en particulier le cotexte, de l’énoncé à interpréter, ce qui conduit à repenser la notion de contexte.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Cours de sémantique argumentative

Abstract: Todos os direitos garantidos. Qualquer parte desta obra pode ser reproduzida, transmitida ou arquivada desde que levados em conta os direitos das autoras e dos autores.

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

A pressuposição-defeito de Paul Henry e a pressuposição argumentativa de Oswald Ducrot

A pressuposição-defeito de Paul Henry e a pressuposição argumentativa de Oswald Ducrot

Argumentative structure of the text of parliamentary speeches (based on the French language)

L’interprétation argumentative en contexte

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About