2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Courbes de croissance in utero ajustées et non ajustées adaptées à la population française. II – Comparaison à des courbes existantes et apport de l’ajustement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using population-based data from a large prospective cohort of children born with isolated CHD, we found that the overall prevalence of SGA was 13% and that of severe SGA 5%, both of which are higher than the expected proportions in the general population, 10 and 3%, respectively, based on the EPOPé population-based growth curves in France (7,11). We also found important differences in the probability of SGA and of severe SGA across the different types of CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Using population-based data from a large prospective cohort of children born with isolated CHD, we found that the overall prevalence of SGA was 13% and that of severe SGA 5%, both of which are higher than the expected proportions in the general population, 10 and 3%, respectively, based on the EPOPé population-based growth curves in France (7,11). We also found important differences in the probability of SGA and of severe SGA across the different types of CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Preterm birth (yes/no) was defined as babies born before 37 weeks of gestation. Birth weight customized z -scores were calculated according to Gardosi references taking into account physiological fetal (sex and gestational age) and maternal factors (weight, height, parity, origin) [ 27 ]. Newborns were classified, according to this customized approach, into three classes: small for gestational age (SGA, ≤10th percentile), appropriate for gestational age (AGA, >10th percentile to ≤90 th percentile), and LGA (>90 th percentile).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age at birth were treated as continuous variables. Sex and gestational age-specific z scores customized for maternal weight, height, and parity were computed using a method adapted for the French 2010 national perinatal survey, from that proposed by Gardosi 27 . Percentiles were then derived and used to define fetal growth categories: small for gestational age (SGA, <10 th percentile), appropriate for gestational age (AGA, 10 th to 90 th percentile), and large for gestational age (LGA, >90 th percentile).…”
Section: Pregnancy and Fetal Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%