2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.01959.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling spectral elements and modes in a spherical Earth: an extension to the ‘sandwich’ case

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe present an extension to the coupling scheme of the spectral element method (SEM) with a normal-mode solution in spherical geometry. This extension allows us to consider a thin spherical shell of spectral elements between two modal solutions above and below. The SEM is based on a high-order variational formulation in space and a second-order explicit scheme in time. It combines the geometrical flexibility of the classical finite-element method with the exponential convergence rate associated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid approaches, where full 3‐D geometries can be implemented in a subset of the globe (e.g. the coupled mode and spectral element approach, Capdeville et al 2003), are promising for computing synthetics with shorter dominant periods using fully 3‐D model geometries in the region of interest. A recent application by Toh et al (2005) modelled the lowermost 370 km of the mantle in 3‐D, pushing the calculations to dominant periods of 8 s. In order to attain shorter dominant periods we use the axisymmetric spherical Earth finite difference method (SHaxi) (based on Igel & Weber 1995, 1996; and extended in Jahnke et al 2006) and explore laterally varying D″ structure beneath the Cocos Plate guided by recent data analyses.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Finite Difference Methods and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid approaches, where full 3‐D geometries can be implemented in a subset of the globe (e.g. the coupled mode and spectral element approach, Capdeville et al 2003), are promising for computing synthetics with shorter dominant periods using fully 3‐D model geometries in the region of interest. A recent application by Toh et al (2005) modelled the lowermost 370 km of the mantle in 3‐D, pushing the calculations to dominant periods of 8 s. In order to attain shorter dominant periods we use the axisymmetric spherical Earth finite difference method (SHaxi) (based on Igel & Weber 1995, 1996; and extended in Jahnke et al 2006) and explore laterally varying D″ structure beneath the Cocos Plate guided by recent data analyses.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Finite Difference Methods and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen & Tromp (2007) studied splitting in body waves from upper mantle anisotropy, but not the more complicated case of core reflections and D ′′ anisotropy. Cottaar & Romanowicz (2013) did not address comparisons between forward methods, but used finite-frequency, three-dimensional (3D) calculations (Capdeville et al 2003) to model splitting in D ′′ , though in S diff waves. Similarly, Komatitsch et al (2010b) also examined S diff , concluding, like Maupin (1994), before, that isotropic velocity variations in D ′′ can lead to apparent splitting; neither case again addressed ScS waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Monterey Ocean Bottom Broadband (MOBB) seismic station is located 40 km offshore in the Monterey Bay, CA, at a water depth of ~1,000 m (Romanowicz et al, 2003;2006) However, the usage of MOBB seismic data for purposes such as regional moment tensor (MT) determination has been greatly restricted due to severe noise from seafloor deformation forced by ocean infragravity (IG) waves� Given the water depth at MOBB, the IG-induced noise on the vertical component seismogram peaks in 20-200s (Dolenc et al, 2005), which overlaps with the band (10-100 s) for regional MT analysis� Fortunately, MOBB contains a Differential Pressure Gauge (DPG) which provides continuous water pressure recordings at a sufficiently high sampling rate (1 sps)� It has been noticed that a strong correlation exists between seafloor vertical ground motion and pressure in the IG band (Dolenc et al, 2005)� A transfer function (TF) between the two components can therefore be defined and utilized to remove the IG noise from vertical component seismogram (Webb and Crawford, 1999;Crawford and Webb, 2000;Crawford et al, 2006;Dolenc et al, 2007)� If the TF is time invariant, then it can be pre-computed and used in a real-time fashion for noise removal� Following Webb and Crawford (1999), the transfer function T(ω) can be expressed as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%