2021
DOI: 10.3208/jgssp.v09.cpeg017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling simulation of microbial growth and MICP phenomena based on reaction-diffusion system

Abstract: Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) has been recognized as that microbial metabolism may induce a generation of calcium carbonates in the pores and/or on the surface of sand particles. However, only actual observations approach of inner structures by microscopes are difficult to understand the MICP process. In the current work, we propose a mathematical and numerical simulation model based on the reaction-diffusion system and finite difference method, respectively in order to understand dynamica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, soil remediation techniques at home and abroad mainly include (i) physical methods, including guest soil/soil exchange, electric remediation, thermal treatment, and mulching [3]; (ii) biological methods, including phytoremediation, bioremediation, and microbial remediation [4,5]. Third, chemical methods include acid/base conditioning, curing/stabilization, and chemical drenching [6]. Among them, physical remediation requires special equipment, which is relatively costly and prone to secondary pollution; biological remediation has a long cycle time; chemical remediation has the characteristics of short cycle time, wide applicability, and diversification of treatment methods, but chemical remediation requires a large amount of chemical reagents to be invested; the heavy metal content of the soil needs to be constantly and repeatedly tested during the remediation process; and the production of chemical reagents cannot achieve lowcarbon environmental protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, soil remediation techniques at home and abroad mainly include (i) physical methods, including guest soil/soil exchange, electric remediation, thermal treatment, and mulching [3]; (ii) biological methods, including phytoremediation, bioremediation, and microbial remediation [4,5]. Third, chemical methods include acid/base conditioning, curing/stabilization, and chemical drenching [6]. Among them, physical remediation requires special equipment, which is relatively costly and prone to secondary pollution; biological remediation has a long cycle time; chemical remediation has the characteristics of short cycle time, wide applicability, and diversification of treatment methods, but chemical remediation requires a large amount of chemical reagents to be invested; the heavy metal content of the soil needs to be constantly and repeatedly tested during the remediation process; and the production of chemical reagents cannot achieve lowcarbon environmental protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%