2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling satellite images with surface measurements of bright sunshine hours to estimate daily solar irradiation on horizontal surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches were carried out for the daily values and very satisfactory and promising results were obtained. [7][8][9]30 One of these approaches by considering a physical base yielded an expression of the form as in Eq. (14).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such approaches were carried out for the daily values and very satisfactory and promising results were obtained. [7][8][9]30 One of these approaches by considering a physical base yielded an expression of the form as in Eq. (14).…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended searches on this subject are conducted and published for the daily values of global solar irradiation on horizontal surface. [7][8][9] Satellite based models such as HELIOSAT are reliable hourly based estimation methods which are firstly developed by Cano et al 6 and used later by many researchers. 3,5,23 Such methods start by calculating the cloud index n and using it directly in the estimations.…”
Section: A Angstrom Type Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the existing literature describes short-term forecasting research with an hourly cycle. There are few reports on the ultra-short-term prediction of PV power generation [4][5][6]. In addition, in the previous research, PV power prediction methods mainly include the following: physical methods, statistical methods, machine learning methods, and hybrid integration methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiative transferring method, taking into account several atmospheric processes such as Rayleigh scattering, water vapour and ozone absorption and aerosol contents, is more efficient in predicting the solar radiation, for example, Gueymard () predicted the cloudless shortwave solar spectra incident on horizontal, tilted and tracking surfaces, respectively; Halthore et al () compared different radiative transfer codes for G estimations. Some attempts have also been made to derive G from satellite observations considering the effects of water vapour, cloud, ozone and aerosols in recent decades (Dubayah and Loechel, ; Chen et al , ), for example, Hay and Hanson () determined the solar irradiance at the ocean surface during GATE using satellite‐based methodology; Janjai et al () developed an model for calculating hourly G from satellite data in the tropics; Rusen et al () coupled satellite images with surface measurements of bright sunshine hours to estimate daily solar irradiation on horizontal surface, but the remote sensing method is also affected by the cloud, aerosols and the passage interval of the corresponding satellites, the model accuracy may not be so good over a small region (field scale) (Zarzalejo et al , ; Li et al , ). Above methodologies have shown relatively low performances when forecasting solar radiation in long‐term basis, and they are not suitable when there are some missing data in the database (Yadav and Chandel, ; Kumar et al , ; Manzano et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%