2016
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2015.2464698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling SAR C-Band and Optical Data for Soil Moisture and Leaf Area Index Retrieval Over Irrigated Grasslands

Abstract: , I. Fayad. Coupling SAR C-band and optical data for soil moisture and leaf area index retrieval over irrigated grasslands. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE, 2015, pp.1-15. 10.1109/JSTARS.2015 Coupling SAR C-band and optical data for soil moisture and leaf area index retrieval over irrigated grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 12 presents the mean RMSE errors for both of these tracks separately. Figures 15 and 16 present a comparison between the soil moisture retrieved by the Model 2 inversion according to Equation (12), and the soil moisture measured at a 5 cm depth by the Decagons GS3 sensors at the grassland and marshland sites. As can be seen in the figures, high compatibility occurred between the SM values that were modeled and measured; however, it was higher for the marshland site.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Retrieval Using the σ° Indices From Sentinel-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 12 presents the mean RMSE errors for both of these tracks separately. Figures 15 and 16 present a comparison between the soil moisture retrieved by the Model 2 inversion according to Equation (12), and the soil moisture measured at a 5 cm depth by the Decagons GS3 sensors at the grassland and marshland sites. As can be seen in the figures, high compatibility occurred between the SM values that were modeled and measured; however, it was higher for the marshland site.…”
Section: Soil Moisture Retrieval Using the σ° Indices From Sentinel-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the soil moisture retrieved by the inversion of Model 2 according to Equation12 (IGiK (Institute of Geodesy and Cartography) product), and soil moisture measured at a 5 cm depth (sm) by the Decagons GS3 sensors at the marshland site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent a perfect complement to optical remote sensing images, because of their completely unrelated imaging mechanisms and their ability to ensure all-time all-weather coverage. SAR-optical fusion is arguably a major topic in remote sensing image processing [1][2][3][4]. Unfortunately, extracting reliable information from full-resolution (single-look) SAR images is a very difficult task due to the presence of intense multiplicative speckle noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%