2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Relation between the Location of Cross-Cut Negative Pressure and Injecting Nitrogen into Coal Mine Goaf

Abstract: Injecting nitrogen into goaf has been widely adopted for preventing fire hazards in coal mines. In this paper, the coupling relation between different locations of negative pressure of cross-cut drainage and nitrogen injection was investigated. The minefield data collection was carried out by an in situ beam tube system on the intake airway and return airway of the mine goaf. The validated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model that was secondarily modified by on-site collected data was applied for further r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They calculated the relationship between the optimal nitrogen injection point N(x) and the cross-cutting (x) working distance through simulation results and the Newtonian interpolation polynomial analysis. The results provided scientific guidance for fire prevention in nitrogen-injected coal mines [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They calculated the relationship between the optimal nitrogen injection point N(x) and the cross-cutting (x) working distance through simulation results and the Newtonian interpolation polynomial analysis. The results provided scientific guidance for fire prevention in nitrogen-injected coal mines [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At the same time, the numerical simulation is based on the iterative calculation based on the actual situation on the spot to predict the disaster. Limited by risks such as roof caving [45][46][47] in the upper goaf and increased concentration of internal gases such as CO, some specific parameters [48][49][50], such as the porosity of the fracture zone, are difficult to measure in practice, and are calculated using theoretical and empirical formulas, and there are certain errors with the actual situation, which is unavoidable. However, with the advancement of downhole technology, these parameters will become more accurate in the future, and the numerical results will be more reliable.…”
Section: Limitations and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%