2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.103.063520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling parsec and gigaparsec scales: Primordial non-Gaussianity with multitracer intensity mapping

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this Fisher analysis assuming the dataset {𝑃 CII (π‘˜, πœ‡), 𝑃 CO(4β†’3) (π‘˜, πœ‡), 𝑃 π‘₯ }, we find 𝜎( 𝑓 π‘™π‘œπ‘ 𝑁 𝐿 ) = 0.65, much lower than the initial experimental setup value for the [CII] auto power spectrum of 𝜎( 𝑓 π‘™π‘œπ‘ 𝑁 𝐿 ) = 1.32. This result is expected since having multiple lines add more constraining power, and we benefit from the multi-tracer cosmic variance cancellation, as addressed in Liu & Breysse (2021).…”
Section: Cross-correlation With Other Linesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In this Fisher analysis assuming the dataset {𝑃 CII (π‘˜, πœ‡), 𝑃 CO(4β†’3) (π‘˜, πœ‡), 𝑃 π‘₯ }, we find 𝜎( 𝑓 π‘™π‘œπ‘ 𝑁 𝐿 ) = 0.65, much lower than the initial experimental setup value for the [CII] auto power spectrum of 𝜎( 𝑓 π‘™π‘œπ‘ 𝑁 𝐿 ) = 1.32. This result is expected since having multiple lines add more constraining power, and we benefit from the multi-tracer cosmic variance cancellation, as addressed in Liu & Breysse (2021).…”
Section: Cross-correlation With Other Linesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We discussed how this can be explained by the fact that these perturbations accelerate the conversion of hydrogen to heavier elements by star formation, and enhance the effects of feedback that ejects the gas out to regions where it is more easily ionized. We note that although the impact of astrophysical uncertainties on f nl constraints with line-intensity mapping data has been investigated in past works [14,16,17], this was done only through parametrizations of the gas-to-halo connection, i.e. M HI (M h ) for the case of H I .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bound is still looser than the CMB one, but the volumes spanned by next-generation large-scale structure surveys should let us reach precisions of order Οƒ fnl ∼ 1, which would mark, even without a detection, an important landmark in our ability to distinguish between competing models of inflation [7,8]. Some of these future constraints on f nl will come from studies of the spatial distribution of (atomic) neutral hydrogen (H I ) in the Universe [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], which will be mapped by 21cm line-intensity mapping experiments such as BINGO [20], CHIME [21], HIRAX [22] and SKA [23]. Compared to traditional galaxy surveying where individual galaxies are identified on the sky and their redshifts are estimated spectroscopically or photometrically, the line-intensity mapping approach targets the integrated emission from all sources (resolved or not) in a given region of the Universe, with the radial information inferred through measurements in different frequency bands [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity mapping surveys may also be used to measure baryon acoustic oscillations (Chang et al, 2008), allowing for inference of the dark energy equation of state and cosmological parameters. Furthermore, they may also be used to measure signatures beyond the standard cosmological model, including primordial non-Gaussianity (Liu & Breysse, 2021) and signatures of dark matter annihilation (Bernal et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%