2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling optimization of composite insulation and vapor-cooled shield for on-orbit cryogenic storage tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boil-off loss targets may require advances in vacuum insulation or mitigation strategies [34]. j. LH2 bunkered cost includes costs of H2 production, delivery, and refueling [35]. Reported minimum, average, and maximum delivered LH2 costs in SARTA FCEB demonstration projects are $5/kg, $5.14/kg, and $5.88/kg, respectively [36].…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boil-off loss targets may require advances in vacuum insulation or mitigation strategies [34]. j. LH2 bunkered cost includes costs of H2 production, delivery, and refueling [35]. Reported minimum, average, and maximum delivered LH2 costs in SARTA FCEB demonstration projects are $5/kg, $5.14/kg, and $5.88/kg, respectively [36].…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the self-evaporating vapor cooled shield (VCS) is further installed in the abovementioned composite thermal insulation system to recover the cold energy of the evaporated low-temperature GH 2 . [36][37][38] In this article, a thermodynamic calculation model of the composite insulation system was established, and the influence of various factors, such as VCS position, vacuum degree, storage pressure, and ambient temperature, on the insulation performance was analyzed. The results show that the HGMs, MLI, and VCS composite insulation system proposed in this article not only effectively recover the low-temperature hydrogen cold energy to be discharged, but also maintain good insulation performance under different vacuum conditions.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/ente202000591mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been verified that cooling only 1/4 the height of the tank skirt is more effective than cooling the entire skirt. A numerical analysis of the vapor cooling channels within MLI showed that the optimum installation of VCS in MLI can reduce the heat flux into the tank by 60% (Jiang et al, 2018). VSC is also applicable to support structures and fill and drain lines of the tank (Eberhardt et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%