Coupling online control and inhibitory systems in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: Goal-directed reaching

Abstract

For children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), the real-time coupling between frontal executive function and online motor control has not been explored despite reported deficits in each domain. The aim of the present study was to investigate how children with DCD enlist online control under task constraints that compel the need for inhibitory control. A total of 129 school children were sampled from mainstream primary schools. Forty two children who met research criteria for DCD were compared with 87 typically developing controls on a modified double-jump reaching task. Children within each skill group were divided into three age bands: younger (6-7 years), mid-aged (8-9), and older (10-12). Online control was compared between groups as a function of trial type (non-jump, jump, anti-jump). Overall, results showed that while movement times were similar between skill groups under simple task constraints (non-jump), on perturbation (or jump) trials the DCD group were significantly slower than controls and corrected trajectories later. Critically, the DCD group was further disadvantaged by anti-jump trials where inhibitory control was required; however, this effect reduced with age. While coupling online control and executive systems is not well developed in younger and mid-aged children, there is evidence of ageappropriate coupling in older children. Longitudinal data is needed to clarify this intriguing finding. The theoretical and applied implications of these results are discussed.3

Cognitive and neuroimaging findings in developmental coordination disorder: new insights from a systematic review of recent research

“…Prospective planning of grip for end‐state comfort was examined in three studies and planning for onward actions in one . Other paradigms were covert orienting of (voluntary) visuospatial attention, steering under different levels of advance information, circular (manual) tracking under visual occlusion, double‐step reaching, visuomotor adaptation for manual aiming movements, and coincident timing using motor imagery …”

“…The IMD account has undergone continued investigation and attracted conditional support across several studies, with some evidence suggesting a developmental delay . However, there are important caveats to this account.…”

Development of motor imagery ability in children with developmental coordination disorder – A goal‐directed pointing task

“…The present study extends previous studies by examining the development of explicit motor imagery ability. In contrast to cross‐sectional studies that can only speculate on within‐subject development, the current longitudinal data show a consistent difference over time in explicit motor imagery performance between children with DCD and age‐matched controls in favour of a delayed onset of motor imagery ability (Annaz et al ., ; Hyde & Wilson, ; Ruddock et al ., ). From a clinical perspective, a delayed onset in DCD suggests that children have the potential to improve their explicit motor imagery ability.…”

Online Control of Prehension Predicts Performance on a Standardized Motor Assessment Test in 8- to 12-Year-Old Children

“…Coordinating and controlling accurate, goal-directed reaching and grasping movements is done many times a day. Visually guided movements longer than about 100 ms in duration may benefit from visual online control (Castiello et al, 1991; Paulignan et al, 1991a,b; Farnè et al, 2003; Tresilian, 2012) which is the ability to quickly and accurately correct one’s movement in response to unexpected changes in the hand or target’s position or orientation, for example, when grasping an object as it is falling from your desk (Ruddock et al, 2014). In such situations, the reaching movement must be altered online, to reduce the error and bring the hand and target closer together.…”