2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of scales in a multiscale simulation using neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [107], the constitutive relationship of the interface layer between reinforcement and concrete is approximated by neural networks, which are trained based on the numerical simulations on the mesoscale. The inclusion of the characteristic length as an additional parameter into the metamodel even allows to simulate softening [134] without a strong mesh sensitivity. However, a weak point of these metamodels is the curse of dimensionality, which means the higher the dimension of the input space the more training data are required in order to build a reliable model.…”
Section: Uncoupled Hierarchical Multiscale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [107], the constitutive relationship of the interface layer between reinforcement and concrete is approximated by neural networks, which are trained based on the numerical simulations on the mesoscale. The inclusion of the characteristic length as an additional parameter into the metamodel even allows to simulate softening [134] without a strong mesh sensitivity. However, a weak point of these metamodels is the curse of dimensionality, which means the higher the dimension of the input space the more training data are required in order to build a reliable model.…”
Section: Uncoupled Hierarchical Multiscale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of training data in the offline stage, we classify these methods mainly into macroscopic and microscopic approaches. In macroscopic approaches, the stressstrain relations, or strain energy density functions, are directly fitted by regression methods, like deep neural network (DNN) [23,24,25,26] and Kriging methods [26,27]. Enabled by recent progresses in computer hardware systems, DNN becomes one of the most popular tools due to its large model generalities [28,29], and has also stimulated applications across different engineering disciplines [30,31,32,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapidness of the FENN method highlights new perspectives concerning the multiscale analysis of biological tissues. Furthermore, NN approaches are beneficial for linking disparate dimensional scales, drastically reduce the computation time, incorporate the results of experimental and/or numerical calculations at low scales and to perform, if needed, inverse calculations to assess optimal inputs for given target outputs (Topping and Bahreininejad 1992;Jenkins 1997;Rafiq et al 2001;Unger and Konke 2008;Hambli et al 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output data are the updated bone properties and some trabecular bone factors. The NN approach is beneficial if the numerical analysis of the complex model is time consuming or unfeasible (Topping and Bahreininejad 1992;Jenkins 1997;Rafiq et al 2001;Unger and Konke 2008;Hambli et al 2006). Moreover, NN models can be applied for the integration of information extracted from experimental data and medical images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%