1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03992.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COUPLING OF NONPARAMETRIC FREQUENCY AND L‐MOMENT ANALYSES FOR MIXED DISTRIBUTION IDENTIFICATION 1

Abstract: Both L‐moment and nonparametric frequency analyses were performed on a series of annual maximum floods from New Brunswick, Canada. The L‐moment analysis concluded that the data were generated from a unimodal Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution. However, the nonparametric frequency analysis indicated that a majority of stations followed nonunimodal mixed distributions since peak flows occur during different seasons and are the result of different generating mechanisms. The coupling of L‐moment and nonp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recent investigations have suggested that the GEV distribution might be an improved alternative to the LP3 for flood-frequency analysis in the USA (Vogel et al, 1993a;Vogel and Wilson, 1996), particularly when using L-moments. Vogel and Wilson (1996) Continental USA LN3, GEV and LP3 1490 Onoz and Bayazit (1995) Different parts of the world GEV 19 Karim and Chowdhury (1995) Bangladesh GEV 31 IH (1999) UK GLO 1000 Vogel et al (1993b) Australia GEV, GP and LP3 61 Vogel et al (1993a) Southwestern USA LN3, LN2, GEV and LP3 383 Gingras and Adamowski (1992) New Brunswick, Canada GEV 53 Pilon and Adamowski (1992) Nova Scotia, Canada GEV 25 Pearson (1991) South Island, New Zealand EV1, EV2 and GEV 275 Nathan and Weinmann (1991) Central Victoria, Australia GEV 53 Wallis (1988) Eastern USA GEV 55…”
Section: Analysis Of Floods Using Homogeneous Frequency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent investigations have suggested that the GEV distribution might be an improved alternative to the LP3 for flood-frequency analysis in the USA (Vogel et al, 1993a;Vogel and Wilson, 1996), particularly when using L-moments. Vogel and Wilson (1996) Continental USA LN3, GEV and LP3 1490 Onoz and Bayazit (1995) Different parts of the world GEV 19 Karim and Chowdhury (1995) Bangladesh GEV 31 IH (1999) UK GLO 1000 Vogel et al (1993b) Australia GEV, GP and LP3 61 Vogel et al (1993a) Southwestern USA LN3, LN2, GEV and LP3 383 Gingras and Adamowski (1992) New Brunswick, Canada GEV 53 Pilon and Adamowski (1992) Nova Scotia, Canada GEV 25 Pearson (1991) South Island, New Zealand EV1, EV2 and GEV 275 Nathan and Weinmann (1991) Central Victoria, Australia GEV 53 Wallis (1988) Eastern USA GEV 55…”
Section: Analysis Of Floods Using Homogeneous Frequency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partitioning of annual maximum floods in New Brunswick by seasons indicated a strong, although imperfect, correlation between seasonal occurrence and flood mechanism (Gingras & Adamowski, 1992). Sample sizes of less than 20 years for many stations, along with poor coordination between meteorological and hydrometric stations, made some of the analysis uncertain.…”
Section: Fig 2 Climatic Regions Of New Brunswick (Taken From Inlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 53 stations were classified into three distinct groupings based on probability density function shape: a unimodal group, a bimodal group and a heavy-tailed group. It should be noted here that, for the bimodal and heavy-tailed group, parametric flood frequency would have fitted a unimodal, and therefore unsuitable, distribution to the data (Gingras & Adamowski, 1992).…”
Section: Fig 4 Cumulative Frequency Functions For Lepreau River At Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Régions géographiquement contiguës : Ces régions peuvent être définies, par exemple, à partir de la similarité des densités non paramétriques des débits de crues GINGRAS et ADAMOWSKI, 1992;GINGRAS et al, 1994;HOSKING et WALLIS, 1993). La validation de cette méthode est réalisée avec l'application des L-moments.…”
Section: Approche Basée Sur Des Régions Fixesunclassified