2014
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi3041256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Land Use Change Modeling with Climate Projections to Estimate Seasonal Variability in Runoff from an Urbanizing Catchment Near Cincinnati, Ohio

Abstract: This research examines the impact of climate and land use change on watershed hydrology. Seasonal variability in mean streamflow discharge, 100-year flood, and 7Q10 low-flow of the East Fork Little Miami River watershed, Ohio was analyzed using simulated land cover change and climate projections for 2030. Future urban growth in the Greater Cincinnati area, Ohio, by the year 2030 was projected using cellular automata. Projected land cover was incorporated into a calibrated BASINS-HSPF model. Downscaled climate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate change, together with human activities such as deforestation, urban development, and unregulated sewage discharge, are further complicating the prediction of watershed-scale processes by placing additional uncertainty on future water resource conditions. In an attempt to answer the numerous important questions posed by the hydrological community, a large number hydrological models have been devised to simulate the hydrological cycle, investigate cause-effect relationships at various spatial and temporal scales, and help in decision-making to find solutions for better watershed protection and management [1][2][3][4]. However, it is considered that these models have not yet been applied to their full potential in terms of watershed management and policy-making [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change, together with human activities such as deforestation, urban development, and unregulated sewage discharge, are further complicating the prediction of watershed-scale processes by placing additional uncertainty on future water resource conditions. In an attempt to answer the numerous important questions posed by the hydrological community, a large number hydrological models have been devised to simulate the hydrological cycle, investigate cause-effect relationships at various spatial and temporal scales, and help in decision-making to find solutions for better watershed protection and management [1][2][3][4]. However, it is considered that these models have not yet been applied to their full potential in terms of watershed management and policy-making [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Built-up areas lead to an increase in impervious surfaces which in turn reduces the runoff concentration time. Accordingly, higher peak discharge rates occur sooner after rainfall in the catchment area [12]. In addition-n, the runoff volume and potential flood risk greatly increases [8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are many valuable land use change simulation and prediction models and related research work, which typically include the system dynamics model (SD) [6], Markov model [7], conversion of land use and its effects at small regional extent (CLUE-S) model, multi-agent systems (MAS) model [8,9], cellular automata (CA) model [10][11][12][13], and the integration of these models [14]. Many studies emphasize in particular a macro perspective of the driving factors to simulate land use changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%