1991
DOI: 10.1109/20.104969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling finite elements and analytical solution in the airgap of electric machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 11 shows relative perturbations of LF calculated using the following expression: (16) where represents the drag/lift LF component calculated for the conductor free of defects.…”
Section: A Verification Of Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 11 shows relative perturbations of LF calculated using the following expression: (16) where represents the drag/lift LF component calculated for the conductor free of defects.…”
Section: A Verification Of Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, the existence of the coupling interface considerably deteriorates the conditioning of the finite element stiffness matrix, which means that standard iterative solvers, e.g., incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient (ICCG), either have slow convergence or fail completely [14], [15]. In order to cope with this problem, several authors have implemented hybrid methods typically combining the finite element method (FEM) either with analytical solutions [16], or with the boundary element method (BEM) [17]. Nevertheless, these methods are still not in widespread use in 3-D engineering problems due to their complex implementation procedures and high computational expenses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the machine rotates, the finite elements in the airgap are inevitably distorted, leading to deteriorate the accuracy. In order to solve the aforementioned problem, the concept of hybrid approaches [3], [4] was proposed which combines both the analytical solution and the FEM. In [3], the Neumann boundary condition was used to couple between the analytical solution in the airgap region and the FEM equations in the stator and rotor regions.…”
Section: A Finite Element-analytical Methods For Electromagnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromagnetic 18,19 The direct method directly plugs the angular velocity into the electromagnetic field finite element equation (10), which will result in asymmetrical matrix and lead to the difficulty of solving finite element equations. So the indirect coupling method is adopted in this article…”
Section: Time-stepping Fem Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 But for the insertion of dense matrix blocks into the sparse finite element matrices, the computational time is substantially increased. 9,10 The moving band method is proposed in Davat et al 11 There is no need of the special elements or coupling techniques; no dense blocks are generated in the system matrix and the system dimension is not increased. 12 For this reason, the moving band method should be superior to the air-gap element method in terms of computational speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%