Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and unidentified trace gases for prescribed fires

Abstract

An extensive program of experiments focused on biomass burning emissions began with a laboratory phase in which vegetative fuels commonly consumed in prescribed fires were collected in the southeastern and southwestern US and burned in a series of 71 fires at the US Forest Service Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, Montana. The particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) emissions were measured by gravimetric filter sampling with subsequent analysis for elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and 38 elements. The trace gas emissions were measured by an open-path Fourier transform infrared (OP-FTIR) spectrometer, proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), proton-transfer ion-trap mass spectrometry (PIT-MS), negative-ion proton-transfer chemical-ionization mass spectrometry (NI-PT-CIMS), and gas chromatography with MS detection (GC-MS). 204 trace gas species (mostly non-methane organic compounds (NMOC)) were identified and quantified with the above instruments. Many of the 182 species quantified by the GC-MS have rarely, if ever, been measured in smoke before. An additional 153 significant peaks in the unit mass resolution mass spectra were quantified, but either could not be identified or most of the signal at that molecular mass was unaccounted for by identifiable species. <br><br> In a second, "field" phase of this program, airborne and ground-based measurements were made of the emissions from prescribed fires that were mostly located in the same land management units where the fuels for the lab fires were collected. A broad variety, but smaller number of species (21 trace gas species and PM<sub>2.5</sub>) was measured on 14 fires in chaparral and oak savanna in the southwestern US, as well as pine forest understory in the southeastern US and Sierra Nevada mountains of California. The field measurements of emission factors (EF) are useful both for modeling and to examine the representativeness of our lab fire EF. The lab EF/field EF ratio for the pine understory fuels was not statistically different from one, on average. However, our lab EF for "smoldering compounds" emitted from the semiarid shrubland fuels should likely be increased by a factor of ~2.7 to better represent field fires. Based on the lab/field comparison, we present emission factors for 357 pyrogenic species (including unidentified species) for 4 broad fuel types: pine understory, semiarid shrublands, coniferous canopy, and organic soil. <br><br> To our knowledge this is the most comprehensive measurement of biomass burning emissions to date and it should enable improved representation of smoke composition in atmospheric models. The results support a recent estimate of global NMOC emissions from biomass burning that is much higher than widely used estimates and they provide important insights into the nature of smoke. 31–72% of the mass of gas-phase NMOC species was attributed to species that we could not identify. These unidentified species are not represented in most models, but some pr...

Ten-year chemical signatures associated with long-range transport observed in the free troposphere over the central North Atlantic

“…In this way, only prominent events were considered to fully include remarkable changes in CO and O 3 , so that a clear and credible slope was more likely to be obtained. Yokelson et al (2013) discussed how the ratio cannot be used to characterize source emissions and plume aging when mixing with air masses of different composition occurs (e.g., plume mixes with O 3 -rich stratospheric air and then with clean marine boundary layer air). For this reason, we reported the statistical significance of the regression analyses.…”

In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a small biomass burning plume

“…Our assignment of m/z signals to specific chemicals in Table 3 thus exclusively relies on two recent studies and the references used therein. Yokelson et al (2013) used results from multiple analytical techniques for assigning m/z peaks. Stockwell et al (2015) used a high mass resolution PTR-ToF-MS instrument for elemental composition determination and open-path FTIR data together with literature reports for mass spectral interpretation.…”

Long-path measurements of pollutants and micrometeorology over Highway 401 in Toronto

“…FTIR spectroscopy has been used to quantify the mixing ratios of various trace species emitted by forest biomass burning (Griffith et al, 1991;Yokelson et al, 1996Yokelson et al, , 1997Yokelson et al, , 2007Yokelson et al, , 2008Yokelson et al, , 2013Goode et al, 1999;Burling et al, 2010;Johnson et al, 2010;Akagi et al, 2013Akagi et al, , 2014Paton-Walsh et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2014), volcanoes (Horrocks et al, 1999;Oppenheimer and Kyle, 2008), industrial parks (Wu et al, 1995), and in urban areas Hong et al, 2004;Coleman et al, 2015). FTIR spectroscopy was also used in flux measurements by the gradient technique at agriculture sites (Griffith and Galle, 2000).…”