2009
DOI: 10.2118/103194-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Equation-of-State Compositional and Surfactant Models in a Fully Implicit Parallel Reservoir Simulator Using the Equivalent-Alkane-Carbon-Number Concept

Abstract: Equation-of-state (EOS) compositional and surfactant models are coupled in a fully implicit parallel reservoir simulator using the equivalent alkane carbon number (EACN) of the oleic phase. The EACN of the oleic phase is computed using a mole-fractionweighted carbon number for each component present in the oleic phase. Important microemulsion properties such as optimum salinity and optimum solubilization parameter as a function of the EACN of the oleic phase are implemented on the basis of known correlations. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Specifically, for surfactant-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR), significant release of the entrapped oil exhibits when there is a microemulsion generated between the surfactant injected and the trapped oil, concomitant with an ultra-low IFT value. [7][8][9][10] With proper design and advances in new surfactant chemistry in the last decade, new generation surfactant chemical flooding has provided much more cost attractive and provided strong economic incentive for site owners to explore it as a viable EOR alternative in recent years. [11][12][13][14] During laboratory screening phase, investigating solution phase behaviors of brine/oil/surfactant mixture is one of the key steps that could reveal the potential outcome of the recovery and the size of chemical slug required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Specifically, for surfactant-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR), significant release of the entrapped oil exhibits when there is a microemulsion generated between the surfactant injected and the trapped oil, concomitant with an ultra-low IFT value. [7][8][9][10] With proper design and advances in new surfactant chemistry in the last decade, new generation surfactant chemical flooding has provided much more cost attractive and provided strong economic incentive for site owners to explore it as a viable EOR alternative in recent years. [11][12][13][14] During laboratory screening phase, investigating solution phase behaviors of brine/oil/surfactant mixture is one of the key steps that could reveal the potential outcome of the recovery and the size of chemical slug required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfactant flooding, whose key principle is to improve pore-level sweep efficiency by reducing the interfacial tension between injected Water and reservoir Oil 1 (Lake, 1989), recently received renewed attention due to the perspective of long-lasting high oil prices. Meaningful simulation of surfactant flooding is challenging, in particular because when the surfactant concentration in the Water phase goes above a Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC), Water and Oil become mutually soluble in a proportion mainly determined by water salinity C S .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meaningful simulation of surfactant flooding is challenging, in particular because when the surfactant concentration in the Water phase goes above a Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC), Water and Oil become mutually soluble in a proportion mainly determined by water salinity C S . Three different phase environments should be considered Lake, 1989). Near the so-called optimal salinity C SOP the surfactant is similarly hydrophilic and lipophilic, and a middle phase called Microemulsion forms, containing the surfactant in excess of the CMC as well as dispersed oil and water (Winsor III environment).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UTCHEM simulator (Delshad et al 1996) used a simple rational function of the trapping number (Jin 1995;Pennell et al 1996) to compute the residual saturation. Han et al (2007Han et al ( , 2009) developed implicit parallel reservoir simulators with surfactant flooding features. No mathematical model of MEOR has reported details of residual oil saturation reductions during the EOR processes or discussed how biogeochemical parameters can affect residual oil saturation distributions in heterogeneous porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%