2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-020-00444-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling coordination measurement of environmental governance: case of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have conducted a variety of studies on this topic via qualitative or quantitative approaches. Qualitative research mainly focuses on the origin and strategies of SHED [38,39], while quantitative research mainly evaluates the sustainable development ability and competitiveness of higher education [31,40], analyzes related factors affecting SHED [41], explores the coordination mechanism between higher education and other factors [42], etc. However, previous studies are mainly based on specific cities or universities, and the spatial-temporal interprovincial comparisons of SHED components are relatively inadequate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have conducted a variety of studies on this topic via qualitative or quantitative approaches. Qualitative research mainly focuses on the origin and strategies of SHED [38,39], while quantitative research mainly evaluates the sustainable development ability and competitiveness of higher education [31,40], analyzes related factors affecting SHED [41], explores the coordination mechanism between higher education and other factors [42], etc. However, previous studies are mainly based on specific cities or universities, and the spatial-temporal interprovincial comparisons of SHED components are relatively inadequate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this mechanism, this study sets up the evaluation index to measure the coupling coordination interactions of the two subsystems. is paper firstly selects indicators for the two subsystems, respectively, based on previous studies [6,20,27,28,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Secondly, the paper screens the data with several principles: (1) the data should represent the key components of the subsystems of the finance and the air environment; (2) indicators should be simple and easy to understand in order to reduce multicollinearity; and (3) the data can be continuously obtained [20,49].…”
Section: Coupling Coordination Mechanism and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the air environment subsystem, three aspects are formed [20,28,47,48,50,51]. e aspect of the air environment pressure mainly refers to the air pollution, including the emissions of the air pollutants, such as smoke and dust, nitrogen oxide, and Sulphur dioxide.…”
Section: Coupling Coordination Mechanism and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the subjective category, including analytic hierarchy process method, expert scoring method, the best-worst method (BWM), full consistency method (FUCOM), level based weight assessment method (LBWA), etc., the methods obtain weights of indices based on personal preferences, therefore, the weights are more likely to reflect the real or preferred ideal situations; besides, the subjective methods can be applied in various fields and thus are welcomed in certain studies; however, the limitations of the subjective methods restrict the further use and make the results less trustful; for instance, BWM is difficult to measure the differences between grades among indices; FUCOM and LBWA are subject to score markers whose personal bias may distort the weight of indices [ 48 51 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%