2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1110913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an important tool for investigating human brain function, but the relationship between the hemodynamically based fMRI signals in the human brain and the underlying neuronal activity is unclear. We recorded single unit activity and local field potentials in auditory cortex of two neurosurgical patients and compared them with the fMRI signals of 11 healthy subjects during presentation of an identical movie segment. The predicted fMRI signals derived from single uni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

85
768
11
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 924 publications
(868 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
85
768
11
4
Order By: Relevance
“…LFP-BOLD coupling was dependant on frequency band and brain region but generally, positive correlations were seen in the gamma band, and negative correlation in the beta band. This general pattern was also shown by Mukamel et al (Mukamel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Boldsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LFP-BOLD coupling was dependant on frequency band and brain region but generally, positive correlations were seen in the gamma band, and negative correlation in the beta band. This general pattern was also shown by Mukamel et al (Mukamel et al, 2005).…”
Section: Boldsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…MEG results bear distinct similarities to results acquired using invasive electrode recording of LFP signals in the auditory cortex of conscious epilepsy patients during natural auditory stimulation. These results, published by Mukamel and colleagues (Mukamel et al, 2005), are captured in Figure 3B for comparison. Notice the general similarities between MEG and LFP, with negative correlation at low frequency and positive correlation at high frequency.…”
Section: Temporal and Spectral Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This high frequency spectral power change has been shown to correlate directly with firing rate [Manning et al, 2009;Miller et al, 2009a;Whittingstall and Logothetis, 2009], and has been demonstrated to reflect broadspectral change across all frequencies Miller et al, 2009b]. Previous studies examined the relationship between spectral power change and BOLD change within a specific region [Logothetis et al, 2001;Maier et al, 2008;Mukamel et al, 2005;Niessing et al, 2005]. We extend this relationship found at the neuronal population volumes sampled by microelectrodes [<500 lm (Katzner et al, 2009)] to a widespread network of movement-related regions on the cortical surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Previous studies investigating the relationship between BOLD signal change and neurophysiology have adopted the strategy of selecting a small patch of cortex in a functionally relevant area, and then tracking both BOLD signal change and electrophysiological change over time [Logothetis et al, 2001;Mukamel et al, 2005;Niessing et al, 2005]. These studies have shown that in one area of cortex BOLD change is best related to high frequency power changes in the local field potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy populations, attention to speech results in entrainment of the subject's evoked activity not only to low‐level features of the stimulus itself, but also the cortical activity of other subjects experiencing the same stimulus 18, 19, 20, 21. This effect has been observed in visual as well as auditory contexts for EEG,19, 20, 22 functional magnetic resonance imaging,23, 24 and magnetoencephalography 25, 26. Moreover, intersubject correlation (ISC) of EEG evoked responses has been shown to discriminate attention better than conventional EEG measures19 and is able to predict selective auditory attention during auditory stream segregation 27, 28.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%