2010
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling BEM/TBEM and MFS for the simulation of transient conduction heat transfer

Abstract: SUMMARYThe coupling between the boundary element method (BEM)/the traction boundary element method (TBEM) and the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) is proposed for the transient analysis of conduction heat transfer in the presence of inclusions, thereby overcoming the limitations posed by each method. The full domain is divided into sub-domains, which are modeled using the BEM/TBEM and the MFS, and the coupling of the sub-domains is achieved by imposing the required boundary conditions.The accuracy of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical formulations are based on the coupling between the boundary element method (BEM)/the traction boundary element method (TBEM) and the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [17] . The approach is implemented to solve 2D systems subjected to transient heat diffusion in presence of thin inclusions.…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical formulations are based on the coupling between the boundary element method (BEM)/the traction boundary element method (TBEM) and the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [17] . The approach is implemented to solve 2D systems subjected to transient heat diffusion in presence of thin inclusions.…”
Section: Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of the present paper have proposed several numerical formulations to simulate transient heat propagation using a frequency domain approach, particularly in the presence of stratified media with or without embedded inclusions [ [14] - [17]]. Some of these numerical formulations have later been validated using experimental results ( [18], [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar technique was also used for the acoustic analysis of non-homogeneous inclusions [38]. Other examples include combinations of the BEM with the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [39,40], BEM with meshless Kansa's method [41], FEM with EFG method [42,43] and BEM with EFG method [44]. Alves Costa et al [45] proposed a coupled FEM-BEM approach for the 2.5D analysis of track-ground vibrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The method of fundamental solutions (MFS) is one of the most powerful meshless techniques that belongs to the category as the boundary-type meshless methods, which has been applied to many engineering problems Tadeu et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2014;. The key idea of the MFS is to represent the solution by a linear combination of fundamental solutions with respect to the source points located outside the domain to avoid the singularity of fundamental solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%