2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.032706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling and binding-saturation effects inL-subshell ionization of heavy atoms by 0.3–1.3-MeV/amu Si ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the coupling effect improves drastically an agreement of the ionization cross sections at low energies for the L 2 -subshell of studied elements and results in better agreement with the ionization cross sections for the L 1 -and L 3 -subshells. Similar conclusions were obtained in our previous studies for the same atoms, and oxygen and silicon projectiles [3,4]. The measured Lsubshell ionization cross sections are also compared to the predictions of the SCA-CSM and ECUSAR-CSM theories in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the coupling effect improves drastically an agreement of the ionization cross sections at low energies for the L 2 -subshell of studied elements and results in better agreement with the ionization cross sections for the L 1 -and L 3 -subshells. Similar conclusions were obtained in our previous studies for the same atoms, and oxygen and silicon projectiles [3,4]. The measured Lsubshell ionization cross sections are also compared to the predictions of the SCA-CSM and ECUSAR-CSM theories in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…They are caused mainly by about 5% uncertainty of the Si(Li) detector efficiency determination, the uncertainties of the fitted X-ray yields (3-5%) and the uncertainties of the target thickness determination using RBS method (3-4%). We point out that achieved relatively small uncertainties of determination of X-ray yields measured with rather low-resolution (170 eV) results from application of the developed fitting procedure [3,4], which reduces substantially a number of free fitting parameters on the energy scale by fitting directly only the ionization probabilities for the outer M-and N-shells. Finally, the measured X-ray production cross sections were converted to the L-subshell ionization cross sections using the atomic parameters modified by multiple ionization effect [3].…”
Section: Experiment Data Analyses and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations