1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01498.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Couples' Long‐term Evaluations of Their Marriage Encounter Experience

Abstract: This retrospective survey was conducted to determine how couples felt about their Marriage Encounter experience an average of four years later. One hundred twenty‐nine couples were randomly selected from those who attended a National Marriage Encounter weekend in Eastern Iowa over a ten‐year period. The results indicated that about 80% of the couples reported a totally positive experience. The most frequently cited positive aspect of the program was the “dialogue” or communication technique designed to encoura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hundreds of thousands of couples, mostly Catholic but also from other denominations, attended weekend retreat programs led by a clergyperson and two lay couples, the aim of which was marital renewal in the context of spiritual renewal (Elin, 1999). Marriage Encounter, which explicitly avoided interacting with marriage and family professionals, attracted concerns from marital therapists and academics about the potential risks of its intensive format for distressed couples (Lester & Doherty, 1983). However, by the late 1970s, the promise of lay‐led community‐based marriage programs seemed enormous.…”
Section: Historical and Cultural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundreds of thousands of couples, mostly Catholic but also from other denominations, attended weekend retreat programs led by a clergyperson and two lay couples, the aim of which was marital renewal in the context of spiritual renewal (Elin, 1999). Marriage Encounter, which explicitly avoided interacting with marriage and family professionals, attracted concerns from marital therapists and academics about the potential risks of its intensive format for distressed couples (Lester & Doherty, 1983). However, by the late 1970s, the promise of lay‐led community‐based marriage programs seemed enormous.…”
Section: Historical and Cultural Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The handful of theses and dissertations on the subject have been plagued by methodological problems, brief follow up periods, and inconsistent findings (French, 1976Huber, 1976McCabe, 1978;Samko, 1976). Aside from Lester and Doherty (1983), existing outcome studies do not report examinations of deterioration in individual couples.…”
Section: Background On Marriage Encountermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third study, Lester and Doherty (1983) conducted a ten-year retrospective survey of 129 randomly selected graduates of National Marriage Encounter weekends. The authors used a questionnaire asking couples to identify positive, neutral, and negative effects of the program on various aspects of their relationship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gurman and Kniskern (1977) raise questions about the long-term effectiveness of enrichment programs, suggesting that change may be illusory. Doherty and colleagues (Doherty & Walker, 1982;Doherty et al, 1986;Lester & Doherty, 1983), in a series of studies evaluating Marriage Encounter, raise concerns over deterioration effects, which are generally not measured in research on marriage enrichment.…”
Section: Dale R Hawley and Davzd H Olsonmentioning
confidence: 95%