2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled orbit-attitude dynamics and trajectory tracking control for spacecraft electromagnetic docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By choosing smaller intervals for š‘’ and š‘’, the overshoot and error are decreased and the error signal converges to zero more quickly. The proposed approach is compared to the classic fast terminal sliding mode control (CFTSMC) method [39] and classic sliding mode control (CSMC) [21,40], which considers the control of spacecraft electromagnetic docking and DC servo motor. The dynamics of the sliding surfaces for all three approaches are depicted in Figure 3.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By choosing smaller intervals for š‘’ and š‘’, the overshoot and error are decreased and the error signal converges to zero more quickly. The proposed approach is compared to the classic fast terminal sliding mode control (CFTSMC) method [39] and classic sliding mode control (CSMC) [21,40], which considers the control of spacecraft electromagnetic docking and DC servo motor. The dynamics of the sliding surfaces for all three approaches are depicted in Figure 3.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(CFTSMC) method [39] and classic sliding mode control (CSMC) [21,40], which considers the control of spacecraft electromagnetic docking and DC servo motor. The dynamics of the sliding surfaces for all three approaches are depicted in Figure 3.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these reasons, achieving high accuracy attitude control for spacecraft system has become a challenging problem. Over the past few years, the demanding issue of spacecraft attitude control has attracted profound attention and numerous control laws are available; for instance, backstepping method [9], eventtriggered control [10,11], model predictive control (MPC) [12,13], sliding mode control (SMC) [14][15][16][17], non-fragile output-feedback control [18,19], adaptive control [20], fuzzy control [21], fault-tolerant control [22], disturbance observer-based control [23][24][25][26][27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other novel space control methods, such as electromagnetic docking [36,37], may receive little benefit from the presented setup. The electromagnetic docking technique involves a set of small spacecraft performing proximity operations that can mutually influence their pose using the homonymous forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%