Abstract:Attributed networks consist of not only a network structure but also node attributes. Most existing community detection algorithms only focus on network structures and ignore node attributes, which are also important. Although some algorithms using both node attributes and network structure information have been proposed in recent years, the complex hierarchical coupling relationships within and between attributes, nodes and network structure have not been considered. Such hierarchical couplings are driving fa… Show more
“…Data sets : in order to test the performance of our method, we selected three networks with node attributes: the counselor relationship network (Consult) [ 15 ], the London gang relationship network (London Gang) [ 55 ] and the Montreal gang relationship network (Montreal Gang) [ 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work of community detection on attributed networks. The attributed network (or attributed graph) [ 15 , 46 ] is a kind of important complex network, which has both topological structures and node attributes. In the attributed network context, the topological structure represents the interactions between nodes and the attributes describe the inherent characteristics of each node in the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, attribute information describes the inherent characteristics of each node and edge and influences the community structure. As the attribute information of node and edge becomes more and more abundant, there are many studies that are beginning to take attribute information into account in the community detection algorithm [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, information fusion is a big challenge [ 20 , 21 ] existing in most community detection algorithms [ 22 ], due to the complexity of multi-source heterogeneous data.…”
Community detection is a challenging task in attributed networks, due to the data inconsistency between network topological structure and node attributes. The problem of how to effectively and robustly fuse multi-source heterogeneous data plays an important role in community detection algorithms. Although some algorithms taking both topological structure and node attributes into account have been proposed in recent years, the fusion strategy is simple and usually adopts the linear combination method. As a consequence of this, the detected community structure is vulnerable to small variations of the input data. In order to overcome this challenge, we develop a novel two-layer representation to capture the latent knowledge from both topological structure and node attributes in attributed networks. Then, we propose a weighted co-association matrix-based fusion algorithm (WCMFA) to detect the inherent community structure in attributed networks by using multi-layer fusion strategies. It extends the community detection method from a single-view to a multi-view style, which is consistent with the thinking model of human beings. Experiments show that our method is superior to the state-of-the-art community detection algorithms for attributed networks.
“…Data sets : in order to test the performance of our method, we selected three networks with node attributes: the counselor relationship network (Consult) [ 15 ], the London gang relationship network (London Gang) [ 55 ] and the Montreal gang relationship network (Montreal Gang) [ 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work of community detection on attributed networks. The attributed network (or attributed graph) [ 15 , 46 ] is a kind of important complex network, which has both topological structures and node attributes. In the attributed network context, the topological structure represents the interactions between nodes and the attributes describe the inherent characteristics of each node in the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, attribute information describes the inherent characteristics of each node and edge and influences the community structure. As the attribute information of node and edge becomes more and more abundant, there are many studies that are beginning to take attribute information into account in the community detection algorithm [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, information fusion is a big challenge [ 20 , 21 ] existing in most community detection algorithms [ 22 ], due to the complexity of multi-source heterogeneous data.…”
Community detection is a challenging task in attributed networks, due to the data inconsistency between network topological structure and node attributes. The problem of how to effectively and robustly fuse multi-source heterogeneous data plays an important role in community detection algorithms. Although some algorithms taking both topological structure and node attributes into account have been proposed in recent years, the fusion strategy is simple and usually adopts the linear combination method. As a consequence of this, the detected community structure is vulnerable to small variations of the input data. In order to overcome this challenge, we develop a novel two-layer representation to capture the latent knowledge from both topological structure and node attributes in attributed networks. Then, we propose a weighted co-association matrix-based fusion algorithm (WCMFA) to detect the inherent community structure in attributed networks by using multi-layer fusion strategies. It extends the community detection method from a single-view to a multi-view style, which is consistent with the thinking model of human beings. Experiments show that our method is superior to the state-of-the-art community detection algorithms for attributed networks.
“…By combining the characteristics of network structure with node attributes, Meng et al [11] propose a novel coupled node similarity (CNS) measure to capture both explicit and implicit interactions between nodes in their paper "Coupled node similarity learning for community detection in attributed networks". CNS is used to generate the edge weights and then transfer a plain graph to a weighted graph.…”
In recent years, as natural and social sciences are rapidly evolving, classical chaos theoryand modern complex networks studies are gradually interacting each other with a great joineddevelopment [...]
“…Obviously, using only one type of information will ignore another type of information. It has shown that combing network topology with attribute information can not only improve the quality of community detection, but also has potential to provide the semantic descriptions of communities, and help to understand the functions of communities [7][8][9][10][11].Existing methods that joint the two types of information can be roughly classified into two categories: model-based methods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and other heuristic methods [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Model-based methods are mainly on the basis of probabilistic generative models.…”
Many real-world networks known as attributed networks contain two types of information: topology information and node attributes. It is a challenging task on how to use these two types of information to explore structural regularities. In this paper, by characterizing potential relationship between link communities and node attributes, a principled statistical model named PSB PG that generates link topology and node attributes is proposed. This model for generating links is based on the stochastic blockmodels following a Poisson distribution. Therefore, it is capable of detecting a wide range of network structures including community structures, bipartite structures and other mixture structures. The model for generating node attributes assumes that node attributes are high dimensional and sparse and also follow a Poisson distribution. This makes the model be uniform and the model parameters can be directly estimated by expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. Experimental results on artificial networks and real networks containing various structures have shown that the proposed model PSB PG is not only competitive with the state-of-the-art models, but also provides good semantic interpretation for each community via the learned relationship between the community and its related attributes.Many complex systems in the real world take the form of networks, in which a collection of nodes joined together in pairs by edges or links. Examples include social networks, biological networks, and information networks [1]. One of the most important tasks in network analysis is to reveal community structures, where communities are groups of nodes with relatively dense connections within groups but sparse connections between them [2-4]. Besides, as emergence of online user-generated media (e.g., Twitter, Facebook and Microblogs), networks are not only characterized by graphs containing node connectivity, but each node also contains rich attribute information. It has attracted a lot of attention on how to identify community structures in these attributed networks (also called attributed graphs) in recent years [5][6][7]. In this situation, three ways can be used to detect communities: using attribute information only, using topological information only, combining the two types of information. Obviously, using only one type of information will ignore another type of information. It has shown that combing network topology with attribute information can not only improve the quality of community detection, but also has potential to provide the semantic descriptions of communities, and help to understand the functions of communities [7][8][9][10][11].Existing methods that joint the two types of information can be roughly classified into two categories: model-based methods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and other heuristic methods [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Model-based methods are mainly on the basis of probabilistic generative models. They model the relationships between node attributes and network structures. By maximizing ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.