The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled model for consolidation and organic contaminant transport in GMB/CCL composite liner under non-isothermal distribution condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The permeability of CCL would also be enhanced with the increase of temperature, which was largely related to the variation of hydrodynamic viscosity coefficient 49–50,53–55 . Besides, the presence of a temperature difference has been reported to induce the thermal‐diffusion of organic contaminants 23–26,42–45 . In consequence, to propose a suitable model for 1D nonlinear consolidation and organic contaminant transport coupling in GM/GCL/CCL composite liner that accounts for the nonisothermal distribution condition, several assumptions are made 6,7,15–22,31–34 : both the GCL and CCL are homogeneous, isotropic and fully saturated; the GM is assumed to be an intact GM; the fluid phase (e.g., pore water) flow in the porous medium follows Darcy's law; the processes of nonlinear consolidation and organic contaminant transport occur in the vertical direction; the theory of nonlinear consolidation is adopted, which means that the permeability and compressibility are nonlinearly varied with void ratio during the consolidation process; the process of thermal conduction in the composite liner is considered to be in a steady state; a single organic contaminant is studied, and the nonlinear consolidation process of CCL is not affected by the diluted concentration; and Fick's second law is valid during the process of organic contaminant transport, in which the influences of diffusion and thermal‐diffusion are considered. …”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The permeability of CCL would also be enhanced with the increase of temperature, which was largely related to the variation of hydrodynamic viscosity coefficient 49–50,53–55 . Besides, the presence of a temperature difference has been reported to induce the thermal‐diffusion of organic contaminants 23–26,42–45 . In consequence, to propose a suitable model for 1D nonlinear consolidation and organic contaminant transport coupling in GM/GCL/CCL composite liner that accounts for the nonisothermal distribution condition, several assumptions are made 6,7,15–22,31–34 : both the GCL and CCL are homogeneous, isotropic and fully saturated; the GM is assumed to be an intact GM; the fluid phase (e.g., pore water) flow in the porous medium follows Darcy's law; the processes of nonlinear consolidation and organic contaminant transport occur in the vertical direction; the theory of nonlinear consolidation is adopted, which means that the permeability and compressibility are nonlinearly varied with void ratio during the consolidation process; the process of thermal conduction in the composite liner is considered to be in a steady state; a single organic contaminant is studied, and the nonlinear consolidation process of CCL is not affected by the diluted concentration; and Fick's second law is valid during the process of organic contaminant transport, in which the influences of diffusion and thermal‐diffusion are considered. …”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal conduction process in the composite liner usually reaches a stable state in a short space of time, 15,16,44,45 implying that the heat capacity Φ is invariant with time. Hence, the steady‐state thermal conduction equations in GM, GCL, and CCL can be further written as: d2Tm()zdz2badbreak=0.33em00.33em()badbreak−Lmgoodbreak−Lggoodbreak≤zgoodbreak≤Lg0.33em$$\begin{equation}\frac{{{d^2}{T_m}\left( z \right)}}{{d{z^2}}} = \ 0\ \left( { - {L_m} - {L_g} \le z \le - {L_g}} \right)\ \end{equation}$$ d2Tg()zdz2badbreak=0.33em00.33em()badbreak−Lggoodbreak≤z00.33em$$\begin{equation}\frac{{{d^2}{T_g}\left( z \right)}}{{d{z^2}}} = \ 0\ \left( { - {L_g} \le z \le 0} \right)\ \end{equation}$$ d2Tc()zdz2badbreak=0.33em00.33em()0goodbreak≤zLc0.33em$$\begin{equation}\frac{{{d^2}{T_c}\left( z \right)}}{{d{z^2}}} = \ 0\ \left( {0 \le z \le {L_c}} \right)\ \end{equation}$$whereTm${T_m}$, Tg${T_g}$, and Tc${T_c}$ represent the temperatures at GM, GCL and CCL, respectively.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations