2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled fluid-flow and geomechanics for triple-porosity/dual-permeability modeling of coalbed methane recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21) (another objective of this case is to verify the efficiency of the linear solver in the presence of multi-lateral wells, and the result is presented in Section 2.6). The coupled geomechanic model follows that of Wei and Zhang (2010), with the assumption that the overburden stress is constant and the horizontal strain at the reservoir outer boundaries is zero. The volume strain equation is used as an external module and is sequentially coupled with fluid equations.…”
Section: Case 5 Knudsen Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21) (another objective of this case is to verify the efficiency of the linear solver in the presence of multi-lateral wells, and the result is presented in Section 2.6). The coupled geomechanic model follows that of Wei and Zhang (2010), with the assumption that the overburden stress is constant and the horizontal strain at the reservoir outer boundaries is zero. The volume strain equation is used as an external module and is sequentially coupled with fluid equations.…”
Section: Case 5 Knudsen Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other model parameters are listed in Table 4. The saturation functions are the same as the illustrative example of Wei and Zhang (2010). For this typical CBM model, the fracture permeability is more sensitive to E than the matrix permeability and has similar sensitivity to ε L with the matrix permeability.…”
Section: Case 5 Knudsen Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-porosity, single permeability model and dual-porosity, dual-permeability model can be used to describe the fluid solid coupled effect for not only the weakly compressible fluid but also the slightly compressible fluid with adsorption mechanism, such as water flowing though fractures in deforming aquifers [1][2][3], naturally fractured reservoirs [4,5], and other mechanical influences. Furthermore, a number of papers have extensively addressed and investigated in the CO 2 sequestration in deep coal seams and coalbed methane recovery with dual porosity or dual permeability model [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Wu et al used finite element model to quantify the net change in permeability, the gas flow, and the resultant deformation in a prototypical coal seam with a dual poroelastic model [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al used finite element model to quantify the net change in permeability, the gas flow, and the resultant deformation in a prototypical coal seam with a dual poroelastic model [6]. Wei and Zhang [7,8] used finite volume method and fully implicit finite-difference method fully implicit finite-difference method to simulate the coalbed methane (CBM) recovery with a triple-porosity/dual-permeability model, respectively. Masoudian and co-researchers [9][10][11]13] did a lot of work to study the effect of CO 2 injection on reservoir and geomechanical performance of the coal seam in a more comprehensive way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, many researchers and reservoir engineers utilize modified porosity and permeability to form analytical formula for simulation and evaluation in different conditions [8,9]. For example, Wei proposed a triple-porosity/dual-permeability model, which considered the effective stress, gas slippage and micropore shrinkage/swelling [10]. Zheng proposed a two-part Hooke's model to consider the geomechanical effects [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%