2016 XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icelmach.2016.7732885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled field and space-vector equations of bearingless synchronous reluctance machine

Abstract: This paper presents a systematic approach for coupling the space-vector model of a synchronous machine with the static field equations and solve the whole system of equations with the finite element method. The aim of the approach is to reduce the computation time without losing the accuracy. The methodology is validated on a permanent magnet synchronous machine and then applied to a bearingless synchronous reluctance machine. Comparison of the results with the measurements and the time stepping finite element… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (a), (b) and (c) respectively. The flux density is computed after solving a quasi-static magnetic problem [12], [13]. Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (a), (b) and (c) respectively. The flux density is computed after solving a quasi-static magnetic problem [12], [13]. Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both motors are supplied with the same rated main winding current and additional winding current with sinusoidal waveforms. The total simulated time is 0.1 s. The time stepping simulation is preceded by a stationary dc computation to mitigate the transient behaviour in the time‐stepping simulations [15]. The torque, levitation force, and disturbance force (force in the x ‐direction) for the inner and outer rotor topology are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methods Of Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suitable time resolution selection for the dynamic analysis and the effect of it on the solution accuracy is a separate topic, and no exact recommendation was found. For instance, the number of time steps per period and the number of electrical periods were used by [5], [6] 300-1000 steps per period and 2-10 electrical periods, respectively. However, all these factors lead to high computational cost for achieving the dynamic solution; consequently, the iron losses computation from this solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ultrafast static field computation method has been presented in [5], by coupling the static field equations and space vector model within the same finite element solution. The method has given accurate results from a single static simulation compared to the measurement and time-stepping method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation