2006
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/34/1/044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled electrostatic-elastic analysis for topology optimization using material interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a conductor and a void, while assuming permittivity to be unity everywhereT P 1 P T . It must be noted here, that the physical model allows for the independent interpolation of dielectric permittivity too [5], though we do not make use of that in our optimization in this paper. The material interpolation is done in the following manner to ensure that regions of high…”
Section: Materials Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a conductor and a void, while assuming permittivity to be unity everywhereT P 1 P T . It must be noted here, that the physical model allows for the independent interpolation of dielectric permittivity too [5], though we do not make use of that in our optimization in this paper. The material interpolation is done in the following manner to ensure that regions of high…”
Section: Materials Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next section, we begin with a brief description of the electrostatic analysis and force-computation when a material is in an intermediate state between a conductor and a void, which was discussed in our recent past work [5]. This analysis method is combined with the new material interpolation model of this paper to lead to topology optimization of electrostatically actuated structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed by Sigmund and Maute (2013), several mathematical schemes exist for the formulation and solution of topology optimization problems, and they have been successfully applied in the fields of aerodynamics (Kondoh et al, 2012; Stanford and Beran, 2011), electrostatics (Alwan and Ananthasuresh, 2006), fluid dynamics (Pingen et al, 2010), and modal analysis (Rubio and Silva, 2008). For the design of single-material structures, density-based approaches such as Solid Isotropic Material Penalization (SIMP) are quite popular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topology optimization (Bendsøe and Kikuchi, 1988), on the other hand, allows large structural changes. Topology optimization of electrostatic actuators has been studied by Raulli et al (2005), Alwan et al (2006a;2006b), and Yoon et al (2008), who collectively dealt with cantilever and inverter electrostatic actuator types They successfully obtained optimal shapes that achieved target displacements. However, these methods, based on the use of the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) method (Bendsøe, 1989;Yang and Chuang, 1994;Bendsøe and Sigmund, 1999), were affected by the problem of grayscales that often occurs in SIMP methods, hence the structural boundaries were not entirely clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%