2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4987801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled DEM‐SPH Method for Interaction between Dilated Polyhedral Particles and Fluid

Abstract: The discrete element method (DEM) and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) can be adopted to simulate the granular materials and fluid media respectively. The DEM-SPH coupling algorithm can be developed for the dynamic interaction between the two media. When the particle material is simulated by polyhedral element, a fluid-solid coupling interface would lead to the complex geometry between the granular particle and the fluid. The boundary particle method is traditionally used for the fluid-solid interface but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method, being easy to work with a reasonable degree of accuracy, could be extended to complicated physics without much trouble [27]. The SPH method is gaining popularity in a variety of fields and has a wide range of applications such as multiphase flow [25,28], biomedicals [15,17,19,29], fluid-solid interaction [12,[29][30][31][32][33], and hydrodynamic instability [34,35].…”
Section: Smooth Particle Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, being easy to work with a reasonable degree of accuracy, could be extended to complicated physics without much trouble [27]. The SPH method is gaining popularity in a variety of fields and has a wide range of applications such as multiphase flow [25,28], biomedicals [15,17,19,29], fluid-solid interaction [12,[29][30][31][32][33], and hydrodynamic instability [34,35].…”
Section: Smooth Particle Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lower limit of in (9) ( = 0) has to be changed to some 0 > 0, as visualized in Figure 3. Consequently, the upper limit + 1 in (11), (13) and results (12), (14) has to be changed to…”
Section: Case 2: 0 < ≤ −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the method applies only to a single‐wall boundary element in two dimensions (2D) for which an appropriate curvilinear coordinate system has to be specified a priori and the relevant equations have to be derived on the case‐specific basis. A fairly rigorous fluid‐solid coupling method in the context of granular flow was also introduced by Ji et al 12 but it only applies to piecewise‐planar solids and lacks the robustness and generality of the semi‐analytical formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, control of the boundary conditions is also difficult. Among the numerical approaches that allow modelling of fluid-particle interactions, the most significant ones are: lattice-Boltzmann method coupled with the discrete element method (DEM) (Lu & Hsiau 2008;Houlsby 2009;Rycroft, Orpe, & Kudrolli 2009;Hassanpour et al 2011), smoothed particle hydrodynamics (Ji, Chen & Liu 2019;Xu, Dong & Ding 2019;Chen et al 2020) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD-DEM) (Wu et al 2010;Hager et al 2011;Jayasundara et al 2011;Tong et al 2013;Zhao & Shan 2013a;Li, Zhao & Kwan 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%