1985
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(85)87035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled-cluster studies. II. The role of localization in correlation calculations on extended systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tion, the integrals, intermediates, and wave function parameters connecting orbitals localized far from each other give negligible contributions and can be neglected. [6][7][8][9][10][11] One of the pioneers of the local correlation methods is Pulay, 6 who used an orthogonal set of localized orbitals [12][13][14] as the occupied one-particle subspace and a non-orthogonal redundant set of atomic orbitals (AOs) projected onto the complement of the occupied space [projected atomic orbitals (PAOs)] to describe the virtual space. To reduce the dimension of the interacting configuration space and, at the same time, the computation cost, for all the occupied orbital pairs a restricted set of virtual orbitals were chosen to define the allowed configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…tion, the integrals, intermediates, and wave function parameters connecting orbitals localized far from each other give negligible contributions and can be neglected. [6][7][8][9][10][11] One of the pioneers of the local correlation methods is Pulay, 6 who used an orthogonal set of localized orbitals [12][13][14] as the occupied one-particle subspace and a non-orthogonal redundant set of atomic orbitals (AOs) projected onto the complement of the occupied space [projected atomic orbitals (PAOs)] to describe the virtual space. To reduce the dimension of the interacting configuration space and, at the same time, the computation cost, for all the occupied orbital pairs a restricted set of virtual orbitals were chosen to define the allowed configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general strategy is followed in the old papers of Förner and co-workers, 7,8 in the incremental method proposed by Stoll and studied by many others, [30][31][32][33][34][35] in the CC method based on the fragment molecular-orbital method, 36 in particular, in the divide-andconquer methods such as the one published by Li and Li,37 and more recently by Ziółkowski et al 38 In other local correlation methods, the correlation energy is expressed as a simple sum of the local contributions without the need for the explicit treatment of interactions of the fragments. The divide-and-conquer CC method recently published by Kobayashi and Nakai 39 applies a buffer region for each fragment to incorporate the effect of the fragmentfragment interactions at the calculation of fragment energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible choice for this purpose is the use of local correlation models, which are these days serious competitors to DFT methods concerning both accuracy and speed. Since the pioneering studies in the eighties, [36][37][38] a number of local correlation approaches have been developed (see, e.g., Refs. 39-47 for representative examples).…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter problem was thoroughly studied by Subotnik and Head-Gordon, who gave a constructive solution [36,37]. Li, Piecuch, and co-workers [38][39][40][41] resurrected the cluster-inmolecule (CIM) approach [42,43], accenting the possibility of a 'black-box' definition of orbital interaction domains. Recently Rolik and Kallay added higher excitations in the CIM-CC method [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%