2022
DOI: 10.1186/s41313-022-00046-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupled Cluster Downfolding Theory: towards universal many-body algorithms for dimensionality reduction of composite quantum systems in chemistry and materials science

Abstract: The recently introduced coupled cluster (CC) downfolding techniques for reducing the dimensionality of quantum many-body problems recast the CC formalism in the form of the renormalization procedure allowing, for the construction of effective (or downfolded) Hamiltonians in small-dimensionality sub-space, usually identified with the so-called active space, of the entire Hilbert space. The resulting downfolded Hamiltonians integrate out the external (out-of-active-space) Fermionic degrees of freedom from the in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, the µ notation is used because the DUCC approach can describe excited states with a proper reference determinant choice despite starting as a ground-state formalism. The DUCC formalism is described in greater detail in [25,35,40], but the foundation of the downfolding approach is that the energy E µ can be obtained by diagonalizing an effective Hamiltonian Heff(DUCC) ext in the corresponding active space (defined by projection operator P + Q int , where P and Q int are projection operators onto the reference function and electron-promoted determinants in the active space, respectively)…”
Section: Ducc Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once again, the µ notation is used because the DUCC approach can describe excited states with a proper reference determinant choice despite starting as a ground-state formalism. The DUCC formalism is described in greater detail in [25,35,40], but the foundation of the downfolding approach is that the energy E µ can be obtained by diagonalizing an effective Hamiltonian Heff(DUCC) ext in the corresponding active space (defined by projection operator P + Q int , where P and Q int are projection operators onto the reference function and electron-promoted determinants in the active space, respectively)…”
Section: Ducc Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a variety of approximations and techniques in recent years for reducing the dimensionality and the complexity of quantum calculations [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. One of the most promising formalisms is the downfolding technique based on the double unitary coupled cluster (DUCC) ansatz [25,[35][36][37][38][39][40], which constructs effective (or downfolded) Hamiltonians in a small-dimensionality sub-space of the entire Hilbert space, which is commonly defined as an active space. The resulting downfolded Hamiltonians integrate out the external (out-of-active-space) Fermionic degrees of freedom from the internal (in-the-active-space) parameters of the wave function, which can be determined as components of the eigenvectors of the downfolded Hamiltonians in the active space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will refer our scheme as ML aided PQE(ML-PQE). In this context we must mention that certain other downfolding techniques have been recently developed to solve classical coupled cluster theory using some sub-system embedding subalgebra (SES) techniques [37][38][39][40][41] and later extended to quantum computing framework as well [42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, a highly parametrized ansätz leads to higher expressibility, but also suffers from high circuit depth and trainability [29]. Other notable works in this direction include: Qubit Coupled Cluster (QCC) [30], Orbital Optimized Unitary Coupled Cluster (OO‐UCC) [31, 32], Double Unitary Coupled Cluster (DUCC) [33, 34], Adaptive Derivative‐Assembled Pseudo‐Trotter Variational Quantum Eigensolver (ADAPT‐VQE) [35], MR‐UCCpGSD [36] and the Projective Quantum Eigensolver (PQE) [37] approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%