2016
DOI: 10.1177/1049732315603367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Couple’s Narratives of Communion and Isolation Following Abnormal Prenatal Microarray Testing Results

Abstract: In 2% to 3% of cases, prenatal microarray testing detects deletions and duplications in a fetus' genome that are undetected by conventional cytogenetics. Many of these changes are associated with variable or uncertain symptomatology. Little is known about how couples experience uncertain results. This study analyzed 24 interviews with members of 12 heterosexual U.S. couples who received pathogenic or uncertain microarray prenatal testing results. Researchers used narrative analysis to examine couples' understa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(81 reference statements)
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants who initially understood their results as abnormal or uncertain were relieved to learn an apparently normal parent carried the same CNV. Such an interpretation is consistent with research suggesting parents interpret findings to relieve anxiety, establish normalcy in their pregnancy narrative (Werner-Lin et al 2015) and assuage dissonance (Semaka et al 2013). Although inherited CNVs may be less likely to pose risk than de novo CNVs (Martin et al 2015), interpreting an inherited variant as benign is potentially problematic because risk may still be heightened since CNVs inherited from an apparently normal parent may affect offspring differently (Costain 2015; Finucane et al 2015; Lowther et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants who initially understood their results as abnormal or uncertain were relieved to learn an apparently normal parent carried the same CNV. Such an interpretation is consistent with research suggesting parents interpret findings to relieve anxiety, establish normalcy in their pregnancy narrative (Werner-Lin et al 2015) and assuage dissonance (Semaka et al 2013). Although inherited CNVs may be less likely to pose risk than de novo CNVs (Martin et al 2015), interpreting an inherited variant as benign is potentially problematic because risk may still be heightened since CNVs inherited from an apparently normal parent may affect offspring differently (Costain 2015; Finucane et al 2015; Lowther et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Such gendering of knowledge may account, in part, for the discrepancies observed between women and men. This, however, limits couples’ ability to equally contribute to informed decision making about the pregnancy, expectations of the fetus’ health, and role as parents (Werner-Lin et al 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limited data are available on how patients perceive VUS and incidental findings with prenatal WES and their impact on decision‐making. In studies of prenatal microarray results in which parents have received uncertain results, they expressed surprise and frustration at the limited information available . Reported in up to 13% of cases, the frequency of VUS depends on the diagnostic laboratory's criteria for reporting WES results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is possible to receive VUS results with other types of prenatal testing currently in use clinically, such as microarray, there have always been concerns about the potential for psychological harm to parents when receiving uncertain information during a pregnancy (Stark, Gillam, Walker, & McGillivray, ). In studies on parents receiving uncertain results from prenatal microarray, women have reported difficulty with emotionally and intellectually managing that uncertainty, especially given the time constraints of decision‐making in this setting (Bernhardt et al, ; Werner‐Lin et al, ). Additionally, the VUS rate is expected to be higher when performing ES due to the larger scale of testing (Grody et al, ) and because of the lack of complete phenotypic information, which drives variant classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%