2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2005.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

County versus region? Migrational connections in the East Midlands, 1700–1830

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamics of urban property prices in Edinburgh are examined by Houston, who (in Journal of European Economic History ) draws on taxation and estate papers, newspapers, and court records to identify reasons for the variation between urban and rural valuations. Meanwhile, the tendency of the literature on the industrial revolution to emphasize the role of large towns in the emergence of spatially‐integrated regions and identities is questioned by Townsend, who suggests that whilst this may hold true for some regions, the pattern was certainly less evident in the east midlands. This might be explained partly by the existence of a weak county urban network and the widespread persistence of proto‐industry, especially in the hosiery industry.…”
Section: (Iv) 1700–1850
Peter Kirby
University Of Manchestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of urban property prices in Edinburgh are examined by Houston, who (in Journal of European Economic History ) draws on taxation and estate papers, newspapers, and court records to identify reasons for the variation between urban and rural valuations. Meanwhile, the tendency of the literature on the industrial revolution to emphasize the role of large towns in the emergence of spatially‐integrated regions and identities is questioned by Townsend, who suggests that whilst this may hold true for some regions, the pattern was certainly less evident in the east midlands. This might be explained partly by the existence of a weak county urban network and the widespread persistence of proto‐industry, especially in the hosiery industry.…”
Section: (Iv) 1700–1850
Peter Kirby
University Of Manchestermentioning
confidence: 99%