2020
DOI: 10.1080/19393555.2020.1767239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Country-level cybersecurity posture assessment:Study and analysis of practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An Organization's Security Posture Security Posture (SP) reflects an enterprise's overall cybersecurity strength and capacities to deter, detect, and respond to the ever-changing threat landscape [18]. Based on different scoring and categorization methodologies [19], [20], the defender can classify SP into finite categories (e.g., high-risk SP and low-risk SP). In this work, we consider a finite number of J SP categories that compose the SP set Y := {y j } j∈J where J := {1, • • • , J}.…”
Section: System Model Of Zetarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Organization's Security Posture Security Posture (SP) reflects an enterprise's overall cybersecurity strength and capacities to deter, detect, and respond to the ever-changing threat landscape [18]. Based on different scoring and categorization methodologies [19], [20], the defender can classify SP into finite categories (e.g., high-risk SP and low-risk SP). In this work, we consider a finite number of J SP categories that compose the SP set Y := {y j } j∈J where J := {1, • • • , J}.…”
Section: System Model Of Zetarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cybersecurity has become more important as a means of addressing risks and threats and providing a stable and secure cyberspace. A lot of tools, guidelines, standards, frameworks, and models have been introduced to provide and assess the level of cybersecurity [13]. Since it is considered a national security factor and priority [4], assessing the maturity of a nation's cybersecurity has become vital to address vulnerabilities, provide protection, and establish necessary strategies and plans.…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem And Significance Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Bahuguna et al [3] stated the need for a national cyber security assurance framework with a dedicated government cyber security bench-marking agency established to validate the cyber security posture of a specific country and its critical sectors on a continuous basis. It did not consider C-SCRM as part of this assurance framework, nor did it acknowledge established baseline national assurance certifications, such as the NCSC UK Cyber Essentials program 4 , or the US NIST Cyber Security Framework [50], nor the NIS Directive [31] that European member states must adopt for operators of essential services.…”
Section: Framework and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%