Country culture moderators of the relationship between gender and organizational commitment

Abstract

Purpose The present study consists of managers and professionals in 26 countries including seven from Central and Eastern Europe. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether culture dimensions predict country differences in the relationship between gender and organizational commitment. The study integrated theories of social learning, role adjustment and exchange that link commitment to organizational roles to explain such differences in gender effects. Findings indicate that an alternative modernities perspective on theories of gender and commitment is better warranted than is a traditional modernities perspective. Design/methodology/approach This study examined the relationship between gender and organizational commitment using primary data collected in 26 counties. The cross-level moderating effects of individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, power distance and restraint vs indulgence was examined using hierarchical linear modeling. Findings Organizational commitment is found to be higher among men than women in four countries (Australia, China, Hungary, Jamaica) and higher among women than men in two countries (Bulgaria and Romania). Results shows that large power distance, uncertainty avoidance, femininity (social goal emphasis) and restraint (vs indulgence) predict an association between being female and commitment. These all suggest limitations to the traditional modernity-based understanding of gender and the workplace. Originality/value This study is unique based on the three theories it integrates and because it tests the proposed hypothesis using a multi-level nested research design. Moreover, the results suggest a tension between an alternative modernities perspective on top-down governmental effects on commitment through exchange and bottom-up personal effects on commitment through social learning with role adjustment in an intermediate position.

Open strategy: what is the impact of national culture?

“…Hofstede identified five major dimensions of national culture: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity and longterm versus short-term orientation. Despite some limitations of the framework (Kirkman et al, 2017), the framework's validity across studies has been established (Peterson et al, 2019;Beugelsdijk et al, 2015). We use four dimensions of Hofstede et al…”

Onboarding New Employees Taking Into Account Gender Differences

“…Also, the mentor needs to test the operation of all systems: he has to check if the printer is connected, if the Internet is working and if all the necessary programs are installed. This factor affects the loyalty of the organization's personnel (Peterson, Kara, Fanimokun, & Smith, 2019).…”

Training effectiveness and employee outcomes: a study of an Australian manufacturing organization

“…Moreover, the effect of diversity training on affective commitment may vary for men versus women. Previous research shows that men and women are different in their attitudes and in their levels of organizational commitment (Khalil et al, 2012;Andersén and Andersén, 2019;Peterson et al, 2019). In this paper, our focus is on how effective diversity training contributes to employee outcomes (turnover intentions and job satisfaction), with a mediating role of affective commitment and how gender will work as a moderator in the relationship between effective diversity training and affective commitment.…”